Kyle Steenland, Youran Tan, Shirley M Mullins, Taylor E Kidd, Qiyun Gong, James J Lah
{"title":"Survival of Patients at a Neurology Clinic: No Improvement Over 12 Years.","authors":"Kyle Steenland, Youran Tan, Shirley M Mullins, Taylor E Kidd, Qiyun Gong, James J Lah","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We previously followed Emory patients with neurodegenerative disease from 1993 to 2006. Here, we follow survivor and new patients for 2007 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied mortality from 10 different diagnostic groups among 4322 research volunteers, and compared mortality rates to controls with normal cognition, using Cox regression. We assessed mortality through the National Death Index, controlling for sex, education, race, comorbidities, and age. Supplemental analyses considered APOE and cognitive test scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine percent of patients died during follow-up. Mortality rate ratios, compared with controls (n=641) in descending order were 12.54, 6.61, 4.77, 4.92, 3.36, 2.25, 2.21 1.71, 1.39, and 1.17 for diagnostic groups ALS, (n=571), FTD (n=197), LBD (n=134), PD (n=584), AD (n=1118), MCI/dementia (n=82), dementia not specified (n=165), PD symptoms (n=256), vascular dementia (n=234), and MCI (n=340), respectively. Women, non-whites, those with higher education, with no comorbidities, and lower ages had lower mortality rates for most diagnostic groups. Mortality rates were higher in the presence of APOE4 variants for several diagnostic groups. Lower MMSEs predicted worse survival for most diseases. Overall, 41% of patients survived during 12 years of follow-up, compared with an expected 75% in the US population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survival times for different diagnostic groups have changed little over several decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: We previously followed Emory patients with neurodegenerative disease from 1993 to 2006. Here, we follow survivor and new patients for 2007 to 2018.
Methods: We studied mortality from 10 different diagnostic groups among 4322 research volunteers, and compared mortality rates to controls with normal cognition, using Cox regression. We assessed mortality through the National Death Index, controlling for sex, education, race, comorbidities, and age. Supplemental analyses considered APOE and cognitive test scores.
Results: Fifty-nine percent of patients died during follow-up. Mortality rate ratios, compared with controls (n=641) in descending order were 12.54, 6.61, 4.77, 4.92, 3.36, 2.25, 2.21 1.71, 1.39, and 1.17 for diagnostic groups ALS, (n=571), FTD (n=197), LBD (n=134), PD (n=584), AD (n=1118), MCI/dementia (n=82), dementia not specified (n=165), PD symptoms (n=256), vascular dementia (n=234), and MCI (n=340), respectively. Women, non-whites, those with higher education, with no comorbidities, and lower ages had lower mortality rates for most diagnostic groups. Mortality rates were higher in the presence of APOE4 variants for several diagnostic groups. Lower MMSEs predicted worse survival for most diseases. Overall, 41% of patients survived during 12 years of follow-up, compared with an expected 75% in the US population.
Conclusion: Survival times for different diagnostic groups have changed little over several decades.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.