Effect of Social Restriction Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity of Daily Living and Disease Severity of Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Sub-analysis of a Double-blinded Noninferiority Study of Donepezil Patches and Donepezil Tablets.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yu Nakamura, Takumi Omori, Kenichi Nishiyama, Ichiro Ishikawa, Hiroshi Aoki, Naoki Nagakura
{"title":"Effect of Social Restriction Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity of Daily Living and Disease Severity of Patients With Alzheimer Disease: Sub-analysis of a Double-blinded Noninferiority Study of Donepezil Patches and Donepezil Tablets.","authors":"Yu Nakamura, Takumi Omori, Kenichi Nishiyama, Ichiro Ishikawa, Hiroshi Aoki, Naoki Nagakura","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously reported that social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, we assessed the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on the activities of daily living (ADL) and disease severity in patients by comparing them to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the impact on ADL, evaluated using disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and disease severity, evaluated using the ABC dementia scale, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a double-blinded, noninferiority study of donepezil 27.5 mg patches and donepezil hydrochloride 5 mg tablets (JapicCTI-194582). After showing the noninferiority of both treatments, we combined the data from both groups for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subpopulation of the per-protocol set grouped by completing the double-blinded evaluation before and on/after the mild lockdown was balanced (n=136 and n=120). Patient demographics were similar between the subgroups. The decline in the DAD and ABC dementia scale scores [least-squares mean (SE)] was ameliorated by social restriction [-3.810 (0.743) and -1.871 (0.697) and -1.147 (0.285) and -0.419 (0.267), respectively (not significant)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normalcy and expectation biases can affect the evaluation of ADL and disease severity by caregivers under high stress and deterioration of mental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously reported that social restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Here, we assessed the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on the activities of daily living (ADL) and disease severity in patients by comparing them to a control group.

Methods: We examined the impact on ADL, evaluated using disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and disease severity, evaluated using the ABC dementia scale, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a double-blinded, noninferiority study of donepezil 27.5 mg patches and donepezil hydrochloride 5 mg tablets (JapicCTI-194582). After showing the noninferiority of both treatments, we combined the data from both groups for analysis.

Results: The subpopulation of the per-protocol set grouped by completing the double-blinded evaluation before and on/after the mild lockdown was balanced (n=136 and n=120). Patient demographics were similar between the subgroups. The decline in the DAD and ABC dementia scale scores [least-squares mean (SE)] was ameliorated by social restriction [-3.810 (0.743) and -1.871 (0.697) and -1.147 (0.285) and -0.419 (0.267), respectively (not significant)].

Conclusion: Normalcy and expectation biases can affect the evaluation of ADL and disease severity by caregivers under high stress and deterioration of mental conditions.

COVID-19大流行导致的社会限制对阿尔茨海默病患者日常生活活动和疾病严重程度的影响:多奈哌齐贴片和多奈哌齐片双盲非劣效性研究的亚分析
背景:我们之前报道了COVID-19大流行导致的社会限制导致阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者认知功能下降。在这里,我们通过将患者与对照组进行比较,评估了COVID-19限制对患者日常生活活动(ADL)和疾病严重程度的影响。方法:我们检查了对轻度至中度AD患者的ADL的影响,使用痴呆的残疾评估(DAD)进行评估,并使用ABC痴呆量表评估疾病严重程度。我们对多奈哌齐27.5 mg贴片和盐酸多奈哌齐5 mg片剂(japicci -194582)进行了一项双盲、非劣效性研究的事后亚组分析。在显示两种治疗的非劣效性后,我们将两组的数据合并进行分析。结果:在轻度封城之前和之后完成双盲评估分组的按方案集亚群是平衡的(n=136和n=120)。亚组之间的患者人口统计数据相似。社会限制改善了DAD和ABC痴呆量表得分[最小二乘平均值(SE)]的下降[分别为-3.810(0.743)、-1.871(0.697)、-1.147(0.285)和-0.419(0.267)](无统计学意义)。结论:正常偏差和期望偏差会影响高压力和精神状况恶化的照顾者对ADL和疾病严重程度的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信