Perception of Learning Environment Among Undergraduate Medical Students at University of Jos Using Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale.

Moses Ahangba Adamgbe, Joshua Adejo Okpanachi, Adole John Inalegwu, Emmanuel Firima, Nenkimun Dirting Bakwa, Sophia Atoshi Gani, Davou Samuel Dung, Emmanuel Yohanna Bature, Victor Ibukun Imade, Gideon Ikemdinachukwu Anuligo, Glory Enoche Alapa, Atarang Aposat Dafong, Iorwuese Joshua Agbatse, James Ichukwu Ojile, Chukwuma Ikem Okoye
{"title":"Perception of Learning Environment Among Undergraduate Medical Students at University of Jos Using Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale.","authors":"Moses Ahangba Adamgbe, Joshua Adejo Okpanachi, Adole John Inalegwu, Emmanuel Firima, Nenkimun Dirting Bakwa, Sophia Atoshi Gani, Davou Samuel Dung, Emmanuel Yohanna Bature, Victor Ibukun Imade, Gideon Ikemdinachukwu Anuligo, Glory Enoche Alapa, Atarang Aposat Dafong, Iorwuese Joshua Agbatse, James Ichukwu Ojile, Chukwuma Ikem Okoye","doi":"10.60787/nmj.v65i6.570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The learning environment (LE) plays a crucial role in the performance and training of medical students. Different tools have been used to assess the LE with various conclusions. However, the John Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES) which is a relatively newer scale is more specific, less cumbersome to administer, and has a wider scope. The study aims to assess the perception of the LE of undergraduate medical students in a Nigerian institution using the JHLES.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study carried out on clinical medical students of the College of Health Sciences, University of Jos. A self-administered questionnaire containing socio-demographic data and the 28 JHLES questions was used. Data was analysed using SPSS version 25.0. The Overall mean JHLES Score was obtained by calculating the average of the JHLES scores attained by all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 clinical medical students were enrolled and a mean JHLES Score of 77.90 (±14.03) was obtained. The males were found to have statistically significantly higher mean JHLES scores than the females, particularly in the domain of Faculty relationships, Academic climate, and Mentoring. The domain of \"community of peers\" had the highest ratings while \"mentoring\" and \"meaningful engagement\" recorded the least scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical medical students had a fair perception of their LE. The areas of strength should be encouraged while faculty may enact programs that will improve the domains with low scores to ultimately make better the learning environment and training of these future doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"65 6","pages":"934-945"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60787/nmj.v65i6.570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The learning environment (LE) plays a crucial role in the performance and training of medical students. Different tools have been used to assess the LE with various conclusions. However, the John Hopkins Learning Environment Scale (JHLES) which is a relatively newer scale is more specific, less cumbersome to administer, and has a wider scope. The study aims to assess the perception of the LE of undergraduate medical students in a Nigerian institution using the JHLES.

Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study carried out on clinical medical students of the College of Health Sciences, University of Jos. A self-administered questionnaire containing socio-demographic data and the 28 JHLES questions was used. Data was analysed using SPSS version 25.0. The Overall mean JHLES Score was obtained by calculating the average of the JHLES scores attained by all participants.

Results: A total of 400 clinical medical students were enrolled and a mean JHLES Score of 77.90 (±14.03) was obtained. The males were found to have statistically significantly higher mean JHLES scores than the females, particularly in the domain of Faculty relationships, Academic climate, and Mentoring. The domain of "community of peers" had the highest ratings while "mentoring" and "meaningful engagement" recorded the least scores.

Conclusion: The clinical medical students had a fair perception of their LE. The areas of strength should be encouraged while faculty may enact programs that will improve the domains with low scores to ultimately make better the learning environment and training of these future doctors.

用约翰斯·霍普金斯学习环境量表研究乔斯大学医学院本科生对学习环境的感知。
背景:学习环境对医学生的表现和培养起着至关重要的作用。不同的工具被用来评估LE,得出不同的结论。然而,约翰霍普金斯学习环境量表(JHLES)是一个相对较新的量表,它更具体,管理起来不那么麻烦,范围更广。本研究的目的是评估的看法,本科医学生在尼日利亚的机构使用JHLES。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在乔斯大学健康科学学院的临床医学生中进行。使用了一份包含社会人口统计数据和28个JHLES问题的自我管理问卷。数据分析采用SPSS 25.0版本。综合平均JHLES得分是通过计算所有参与者的JHLES得分的平均值得到的。结果:共入组临床医学生400名,JHLES评分平均为77.90(±14.03)分。研究发现,男性的JHLES平均得分显著高于女性,尤其是在教师关系、学术氛围和指导方面。“同伴社区”得分最高,而“指导”和“有意义的参与”得分最低。结论:临床医学生对自己的LE有较好的认知。优势领域应该得到鼓励,而教师可以制定计划,改善分数低的领域,最终为这些未来的医生创造更好的学习环境和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信