Retrospective analysis of the effect of electronic cardiotocography on selected birth and neonatal variables among 4172 women from a Single Centre in Warsaw, Poland.

Sylwia Lidia Rychlewicz, Grazyna Baczek, Patryk Rzonca, Piotr Wegrzyn, Agnieszka Uryga, Justyna Teliga-Czajkowska
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of the effect of electronic cardiotocography on selected birth and neonatal variables among 4172 women from a Single Centre in Warsaw, Poland.","authors":"Sylwia Lidia Rychlewicz, Grazyna Baczek, Patryk Rzonca, Piotr Wegrzyn, Agnieszka Uryga, Justyna Teliga-Czajkowska","doi":"10.5603/gpl.103375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiotocography (KTG) is widely used for continuous or intermittent assessment of fetal heart function. This study aimed to compare the effects of continuous and intermittent KTG during labour on selected variables.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a retrospective study, 4172 medical records of Warsaw Hospital (Poland) patients were analysed. The study group consisted of 2111 women with continuous KTG during labour and the control group of 2061 women with periodic KTG. The median age of the women was 30 years, and the median gestation period was 40 Hbd. Most of the women lived in urban areas (87.15%), were in a relationship (82.05%) and had a higher education (86.60%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group with intermittent OCT, delivery by caesarean section was indistinguishably more frequent (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.87-1.30), there were significantly fewer grade II perineal ruptures (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55), grade III- and IV perineal ruptures (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.12-23.53) and oxygen therapy (OR = 1.76, p = 0.004). More infants with Apgar scores ≤ 7 points at the fifth minute (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12-0.094), requiring nCPAP (Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86) and resuscitation [OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.79]) were born in the group with periodic ECG. The analysis showed that the group of women with continuous OCT during labour had a lower risk of acid-base disorders (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21-0.98) CONCLUSIONS: Continuous KTG during labour in high-risk women increases the likelihood of instrumental delivery (using vacuum) and perineal incision compared with periodic KTG. The use of intermittent ECG during labour reduces the number of newborns with Apgar scores ≤ 7 points and decreases the number of neonatal interventions such as nCPAP and resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.103375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cardiotocography (KTG) is widely used for continuous or intermittent assessment of fetal heart function. This study aimed to compare the effects of continuous and intermittent KTG during labour on selected variables.

Material and methods: In a retrospective study, 4172 medical records of Warsaw Hospital (Poland) patients were analysed. The study group consisted of 2111 women with continuous KTG during labour and the control group of 2061 women with periodic KTG. The median age of the women was 30 years, and the median gestation period was 40 Hbd. Most of the women lived in urban areas (87.15%), were in a relationship (82.05%) and had a higher education (86.60%).

Results: In the group with intermittent OCT, delivery by caesarean section was indistinguishably more frequent (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.87-1.30), there were significantly fewer grade II perineal ruptures (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55), grade III- and IV perineal ruptures (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.12-23.53) and oxygen therapy (OR = 1.76, p = 0.004). More infants with Apgar scores ≤ 7 points at the fifth minute (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12-0.094), requiring nCPAP (Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86) and resuscitation [OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.79]) were born in the group with periodic ECG. The analysis showed that the group of women with continuous OCT during labour had a lower risk of acid-base disorders (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21-0.98) CONCLUSIONS: Continuous KTG during labour in high-risk women increases the likelihood of instrumental delivery (using vacuum) and perineal incision compared with periodic KTG. The use of intermittent ECG during labour reduces the number of newborns with Apgar scores ≤ 7 points and decreases the number of neonatal interventions such as nCPAP and resuscitation.

回顾性分析来自波兰华沙单一中心的4172名妇女的电子心动图对选定的出生和新生儿变量的影响。
目的:心脏造影(KTG)广泛用于胎儿心脏功能的连续或间歇评估。本研究旨在比较分娩期间连续和间歇KTG对选定变量的影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析了波兰华沙医院4172例患者的病历。研究组包括2111名分娩期间持续KTG的妇女,对照组包括2061名周期性KTG的妇女。女性的中位年龄为30岁,中位妊娠期为40 Hbd。大多数女性居住在城市地区(87.15%),有伴侣(82.05%),受过高等教育(86.60%)。结果:间歇OCT组剖宫产的发生率无明显差异(OR = 1.06;95% CI = 0.87-1.30), II级会阴破裂(OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55), III级和IV级会阴破裂(OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.12-23.53)和氧疗(OR = 1.76, p = 0.004)明显减少。周期性心电图组在第5分钟Apgar评分≤7分(OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12-0.094),需要nCPAP(鼻腔持续气道正压通气)(OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39-0.86)和复苏[OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.79]的新生儿较多。分析显示,分娩期间连续行OCT的妇女发生酸碱紊乱的风险较低(OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21-0.98)。结论:与定期行KTG相比,高危妇女分娩期间持续行KTG增加器械分娩(真空)和会阴切口的可能性。产程间歇心电图的使用减少了Apgar评分≤7分的新生儿数量,减少了nCPAP、复苏等新生儿干预次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信