Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol.

HRB open research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2
Niamh A Merriman, Rose S Penfold, Louise Brent, Pamela Hickey, Mary E Walsh, Eithne Sexton, Tara Coughlan, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Antony Johansen, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Andrew J Hall, Catherine Blake
{"title":"Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol.","authors":"Niamh A Merriman, Rose S Penfold, Louise Brent, Pamela Hickey, Mary E Walsh, Eithne Sexton, Tara Coughlan, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Antony Johansen, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Andrew J Hall, Catherine Blake","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium and cognitive impairment are common in hip fracture populations and are associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. National hip fracture registries facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality, such as reduced mortality and the development of specialist multidisciplinary services. However, there is substantial variation in the data collected and reported in relation to delirium and cognition, which impedes international comparison and may reduce quality of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to identify delirium and cognition data items currently collected by hip fracture registries internationally, to identify associated registry guidance that exists for the administration of delirium and cognitive screening tools, and report outcomes of these data items across the most recently published annual reports of identified hip fracture registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Relevant websites such as the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) will also be searched. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two research team members, with discrepancies resolved by a third member of the research team. Data extraction and synthesis will be conducted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy and omissions by another. The scoping review findings will be informed and validated through engagement with the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group, who will share their knowledge, expertise, and research to achieve consensus over core aspects of the scoping review findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By identifying existing heterogeneity in delirium and cognitive screening tool use and administration, it is hoped that administration and specific screening tool use will become standardised to optimise comparability across countries and ensure that high quality and reliable data are included across international registry reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13996.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium and cognitive impairment are common in hip fracture populations and are associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. National hip fracture registries facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality, such as reduced mortality and the development of specialist multidisciplinary services. However, there is substantial variation in the data collected and reported in relation to delirium and cognition, which impedes international comparison and may reduce quality of care.

Objective: This scoping review aims to identify delirium and cognition data items currently collected by hip fracture registries internationally, to identify associated registry guidance that exists for the administration of delirium and cognitive screening tools, and report outcomes of these data items across the most recently published annual reports of identified hip fracture registries.

Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Relevant websites such as the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) will also be searched. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two research team members, with discrepancies resolved by a third member of the research team. Data extraction and synthesis will be conducted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy and omissions by another. The scoping review findings will be informed and validated through engagement with the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group, who will share their knowledge, expertise, and research to achieve consensus over core aspects of the scoping review findings.

Conclusion: By identifying existing heterogeneity in delirium and cognitive screening tool use and administration, it is hoped that administration and specific screening tool use will become standardised to optimise comparability across countries and ensure that high quality and reliable data are included across international registry reports.

国家髋部骨折登记处的谵妄和认知筛查:范围审查方案。
背景:谵妄和认知障碍在髋部骨折人群中很常见,并与显著的不良患者预后相关。国家髋部骨折登记有助于改善患者预后和护理质量,如降低死亡率和发展专业多学科服务。然而,收集和报告的有关谵妄和认知的数据存在很大差异,这妨碍了国际比较,并可能降低护理质量。目的:本综述旨在确定目前国际上髋部骨折注册中心收集的谵妄和认知数据项目,确定谵妄和认知筛查工具管理的相关注册指南,并报告这些数据项目在最近发表的已确定髋部骨折注册中心年度报告中的结果。方法:本范围审查将按照范围审查扩展的系统审查首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行。我们将搜索以下数据库:Medline Ovid;Embase;CINAHL专文。相关网站,如脆性断裂网络(FFN)也将进行搜索。研究选择和审查将由两名研究小组成员独立进行,差异由研究小组的第三名成员解决。数据提取和合成将由一名审稿人进行,并由另一名审稿人检查准确性和遗漏。范围审查结果将通过FFN髋部骨折审计特别兴趣小组的参与进行通知和验证,该小组将分享他们的知识、专业知识和研究成果,以就范围审查结果的核心方面达成共识。结论:通过识别谵妄和认知筛查工具使用和管理的现有异质性,希望管理和特定筛查工具的使用将变得标准化,以优化各国之间的可比性,并确保高质量和可靠的数据包括在国际登记报告中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信