Expansion of perceived passable width in older adults

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Naoki Kuroda , Ryo Teraoka , Shinya Harada , Wataru Teramoto
{"title":"Expansion of perceived passable width in older adults","authors":"Naoki Kuroda ,&nbsp;Ryo Teraoka ,&nbsp;Shinya Harada ,&nbsp;Wataru Teramoto","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2025.103324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans can perceive whether an aperture is passable; this ability is known as passable width perception. Previous studies have shown that passable width in older adults is larger when walking and suggested the effect of larger body sway in older adults while walking on passable width expansion. However, no studies have directly investigated this. Thus, the present study conducted two experiments to investigate the effect of body instability on passable width perception in young and older adults. In Experiment 1, young and older adult participants kept standing upright with their feet together (i.e., Romberg stance) or with their feet in line (i.e., Tandem stance) while observing various aperture widths presented on a large display at a distance of 3 m. The participants were required to judge whether the aperture was passable without turning their shoulders. During the task, body sway was measured using a motion capture device. The results showed larger sway in the Tandem stance than in the Romberg stance, irrespective of age group; however, a change in perceived passable width was observed only in older adults: it expanded in the unstable condition compared to the stable condition. In Experiment 2, the young adults performed the same task with a more unstable stance (i.e., one-leg standing) than that adopted in Experiment 1. Nevertheless, it did not affect their passable width perception. These results suggest that only older adults exploit the online status of their body sway to estimate their safety margins even during a non-walking situation. Future studies on passable width perception are expected to measure body sway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 103324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945725000053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans can perceive whether an aperture is passable; this ability is known as passable width perception. Previous studies have shown that passable width in older adults is larger when walking and suggested the effect of larger body sway in older adults while walking on passable width expansion. However, no studies have directly investigated this. Thus, the present study conducted two experiments to investigate the effect of body instability on passable width perception in young and older adults. In Experiment 1, young and older adult participants kept standing upright with their feet together (i.e., Romberg stance) or with their feet in line (i.e., Tandem stance) while observing various aperture widths presented on a large display at a distance of 3 m. The participants were required to judge whether the aperture was passable without turning their shoulders. During the task, body sway was measured using a motion capture device. The results showed larger sway in the Tandem stance than in the Romberg stance, irrespective of age group; however, a change in perceived passable width was observed only in older adults: it expanded in the unstable condition compared to the stable condition. In Experiment 2, the young adults performed the same task with a more unstable stance (i.e., one-leg standing) than that adopted in Experiment 1. Nevertheless, it did not affect their passable width perception. These results suggest that only older adults exploit the online status of their body sway to estimate their safety margins even during a non-walking situation. Future studies on passable width perception are expected to measure body sway.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement Science
Human Movement Science 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
89
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome. These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信