Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marium Arif, Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Hafiz Rabbi Ul Ehsan
{"title":"Development and validation of a tool to measure telehealth educational environment (THEEM).","authors":"Marium Arif, Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Hafiz Rabbi Ul Ehsan","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06751-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth is gaining importance in improving healthcare access and outcomes, particularly in underserved regions. Despite its potential, healthcare providers in developing countries struggle to effectively utilize telehealth tools, highlighting the need for structured training. This study aims to develop and validate a specialized tool to assess the telehealth educational environment, addressing the unique challenges of integrating clinical, technological, and interpersonal skills in telehealth education.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To develop a tool for measuring the telehealth educational environment, addressing the unique aspects of telehealth education. (2) To evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-methods exploratory study had two phases. In Phase 1, the THEEM tool was developed through a literature review and expert feedback. In Phase 2, the tool was validated using content validity, response process validity via cognitive interviews, and construct validity through Exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Participants included telehealth physicians, selected via purposive sampling. Data analysis involved calculating the content validity index for items (CVI-I) and the scale (CVI-S), with values ≥ 0.7. For factor analysis, eigenvalues > 1 and factor loadings ≥ 0.50 were retained. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was considered acceptable at ≥ 0.7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Preliminary THEEM tool consisted of 35 items. Following content validity through expert validation, the number of items was reduced to 32 based on I-CVI values. S-CVI was 0.86. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors with a further reduction in the item number to 30. Internal consistency of the final tool with 30 items was calculated as 0·9, suggesting excellent internal consistency of the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The THEEM tool provides a valuable, reliable, and valid instrument for assessing the telehealth educational environment. Its development fills a significant gap in existing measurement tools, specifically addressing the needs of telehealth education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06751-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth is gaining importance in improving healthcare access and outcomes, particularly in underserved regions. Despite its potential, healthcare providers in developing countries struggle to effectively utilize telehealth tools, highlighting the need for structured training. This study aims to develop and validate a specialized tool to assess the telehealth educational environment, addressing the unique challenges of integrating clinical, technological, and interpersonal skills in telehealth education.

Objectives: (1) To develop a tool for measuring the telehealth educational environment, addressing the unique aspects of telehealth education. (2) To evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool.

Method: This mixed-methods exploratory study had two phases. In Phase 1, the THEEM tool was developed through a literature review and expert feedback. In Phase 2, the tool was validated using content validity, response process validity via cognitive interviews, and construct validity through Exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Participants included telehealth physicians, selected via purposive sampling. Data analysis involved calculating the content validity index for items (CVI-I) and the scale (CVI-S), with values ≥ 0.7. For factor analysis, eigenvalues > 1 and factor loadings ≥ 0.50 were retained. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was considered acceptable at ≥ 0.7.

Results: The Preliminary THEEM tool consisted of 35 items. Following content validity through expert validation, the number of items was reduced to 32 based on I-CVI values. S-CVI was 0.86. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors with a further reduction in the item number to 30. Internal consistency of the final tool with 30 items was calculated as 0·9, suggesting excellent internal consistency of the tool.

Conclusion: The THEEM tool provides a valuable, reliable, and valid instrument for assessing the telehealth educational environment. Its development fills a significant gap in existing measurement tools, specifically addressing the needs of telehealth education.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信