Development and validation of a county deprivation index for assessing socio-economic disparities in the United States: Implications for public health outcomes and mitigation strategies.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
W D Irish, A E Burch, A Landry, M D Honaker, J Wong
{"title":"Development and validation of a county deprivation index for assessing socio-economic disparities in the United States: Implications for public health outcomes and mitigation strategies.","authors":"W D Irish, A E Burch, A Landry, M D Honaker, J Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a county deprivation index (CDI) that assesses socio-economic disparities and their impact on health outcomes at the county level.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional study using publicly available county-level data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group 18 county-level socio-economic indicators into three clusters: economic well-being and technical connectivity, socio-economic disadvantage and vulnerability, and housing affordability and quality of life. The CDI was derived from model coefficients and validated by comparing its performance to established county deprivation measures, including the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and the Multidimensional Deprivation Index (MDI), in predicting disease-specific mortality rates. We also assessed the CDI's ability to explain variability in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) county health scores across eight randomly selected states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 3107 counties from the contiguous US. The CDI explained 45 % of the variance in age-adjusted avoidable heart disease and stroke death rates, 20 % in cancer mortality rates, 19 % in lung cancer mortality rates, and 52 % in all-cause mortality rates, outperforming the SDI and MDI. It also accounted for 63-91 % of the variance in RWJF health outcome and factor scores across selected states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDI demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to existing indices, making it a valuable tool for identifying health disparities and guiding targeted public health interventions. Regular updates of the CDI will be necessary to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in capturing evolving socio-economic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a county deprivation index (CDI) that assesses socio-economic disparities and their impact on health outcomes at the county level.

Study design: A retrospective, cross-sectional study using publicly available county-level data.

Methods: Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group 18 county-level socio-economic indicators into three clusters: economic well-being and technical connectivity, socio-economic disadvantage and vulnerability, and housing affordability and quality of life. The CDI was derived from model coefficients and validated by comparing its performance to established county deprivation measures, including the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and the Multidimensional Deprivation Index (MDI), in predicting disease-specific mortality rates. We also assessed the CDI's ability to explain variability in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) county health scores across eight randomly selected states.

Results: The analysis included 3107 counties from the contiguous US. The CDI explained 45 % of the variance in age-adjusted avoidable heart disease and stroke death rates, 20 % in cancer mortality rates, 19 % in lung cancer mortality rates, and 52 % in all-cause mortality rates, outperforming the SDI and MDI. It also accounted for 63-91 % of the variance in RWJF health outcome and factor scores across selected states.

Conclusions: The CDI demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to existing indices, making it a valuable tool for identifying health disparities and guiding targeted public health interventions. Regular updates of the CDI will be necessary to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in capturing evolving socio-economic conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信