Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study.

Emily J Tomlinson, Monica Schoch, Rital Lakshman, Jo McDonall, Lauren McTier
{"title":"Students' perceptions of assessment feedback in an undergraduate nursing and midwifery subject: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Emily J Tomlinson, Monica Schoch, Rital Lakshman, Jo McDonall, Lauren McTier","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2025.2449964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%, <i>n</i> = 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree, <i>n</i> = 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%, <i>n</i> = 47). Qualitative themes identified were <i>engagement with assessments</i>, <i>appropriateness of feedback</i>, and <i>use of scaffolded feedback</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important.</p>","PeriodicalId":93954,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary nurse","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2025.2449964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing course, students enrol in an evidence-based Practice (EBP) subject. Three scaffolded tasks assess students' ability to find, summarise and synthesise professional literature. For each assessment task, students are provided feedback that informs subsequent assessments. It is unclear how students use the feedback, and what elements of feedback are perceived as being most useful.

Aim: This study aimed to examine nursing students' perspectives of receiving feedback from scaffolded assessments and how feedback received influenced the development of the final assessment task.

Design: A mixed-methods approach was used with a cross-sectional survey and online qualitative interviews.

Setting: This research was conducted at Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery in Melbourne, Australia.

Participants: One hundred forty-eight students (17.4%, n = 851) participated in the cross-sectional survey. Seven students participated in the online qualitative interviews.

Methods: Students enrolled in the EBP subject in Trimester, 2023 were invited to participate in a survey where they rated their experience of assessment feedback using a Likert scale. Students were also invited to participate in an online qualitative interview that further explored their perceptions.

Results: Assessment exemplars were highly beneficial to understanding the assessment task (87.8% agree/strongly agree, n = 107). Responding to feedback was challenging (38.5%, n = 47). Qualitative themes identified were engagement with assessments, appropriateness of feedback, and use of scaffolded feedback.

Conclusions: This study highlights that scaffolded feedback is valuable for student learning. Feedback in each rubric criterion helps with the alignment of learning outcomes. Resources that support students in how to respond to feedback are important.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信