Concordance Between Trainee Self-Assessment and Expert Assessment of Cold Snare Polypectomy Competence: Results From a Randomized Clinical Study.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005982
Swati G Patel, Larissa Muething, Tonya Kaltenbach, Tiffany Nguyen-Vu, Carmel Malvar, Rajesh N Keswani, Matthew Hall, Eva Aagaard, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Yung Ka Chin, Hazem Hammad, Amit Rastogi, Amandeep Shergill, Violet Simon, Alan Soetikno, Roy Soetikno, Sachin Wani
{"title":"Concordance Between Trainee Self-Assessment and Expert Assessment of Cold Snare Polypectomy Competence: Results From a Randomized Clinical Study.","authors":"Swati G Patel, Larissa Muething, Tonya Kaltenbach, Tiffany Nguyen-Vu, Carmel Malvar, Rajesh N Keswani, Matthew Hall, Eva Aagaard, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Yung Ka Chin, Hazem Hammad, Amit Rastogi, Amandeep Shergill, Violet Simon, Alan Soetikno, Roy Soetikno, Sachin Wani","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many trainees lack competence in performing cold snare polypectomy (CSP), and longer observation periods using assessment tools, such as the Cold Snare Polypectomy Assessment Tool (CSPAT), may be required. However, these tools are not commonly used in busy academic endoscopy practices. This study evaluates the concordance between trainee self-assessment of CSP with expert assessment and assesses factors associated with concordance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Consecutive CSPs performed by gastroenterology trainees from 2 institutions were video recorded and rated by 8 blinded experts from 4 different academic institutions in the United States and Singapore using the CSPAT from August 2017 to February 2020. Trainees self-assessed competence for each CSP immediately after the procedure. Concordance between trainee and trainer was reported as percentage of agreement in competence (score of 3 or 4) or not yet competent (score of 1 or 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two trainees performed 765 colonoscopies with 2,267 CSPs. Concordance was found between expert and trainee assessment of competence for 1,380 CSPs (60.9%; 95% CI, 58.8%-62.9%; weighted κ = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.16). Trainees underassessed competence for 541 CSPs (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.1%-25.7%) and overassessed competence for 326 CSPs (15.3%; 95% CI, 13.8%-16.8%). Career plan of private practice general gastroenterology (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.92) and lower colonoscopy volume before study (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62) were independently associated with lower likelihood of concordance between expert and trainee assessment of competence. Structured feedback was not associated with concordance, and there was no change as trainees gained experience; however, feedback decreased the proportion of overassessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is poor concordance between trainee self-assessment and trainer assessment of CSP. Self-assessment can be used as an initial part of competency assessment, which should then be reconciled with external assessments to improve concordance in assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"605-613"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many trainees lack competence in performing cold snare polypectomy (CSP), and longer observation periods using assessment tools, such as the Cold Snare Polypectomy Assessment Tool (CSPAT), may be required. However, these tools are not commonly used in busy academic endoscopy practices. This study evaluates the concordance between trainee self-assessment of CSP with expert assessment and assesses factors associated with concordance.

Method: Consecutive CSPs performed by gastroenterology trainees from 2 institutions were video recorded and rated by 8 blinded experts from 4 different academic institutions in the United States and Singapore using the CSPAT from August 2017 to February 2020. Trainees self-assessed competence for each CSP immediately after the procedure. Concordance between trainee and trainer was reported as percentage of agreement in competence (score of 3 or 4) or not yet competent (score of 1 or 2).

Results: Twenty-two trainees performed 765 colonoscopies with 2,267 CSPs. Concordance was found between expert and trainee assessment of competence for 1,380 CSPs (60.9%; 95% CI, 58.8%-62.9%; weighted κ = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.16). Trainees underassessed competence for 541 CSPs (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.1%-25.7%) and overassessed competence for 326 CSPs (15.3%; 95% CI, 13.8%-16.8%). Career plan of private practice general gastroenterology (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.92) and lower colonoscopy volume before study (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62) were independently associated with lower likelihood of concordance between expert and trainee assessment of competence. Structured feedback was not associated with concordance, and there was no change as trainees gained experience; however, feedback decreased the proportion of overassessments.

Conclusions: There is poor concordance between trainee self-assessment and trainer assessment of CSP. Self-assessment can be used as an initial part of competency assessment, which should then be reconciled with external assessments to improve concordance in assessments.

一项随机临床研究的结果:学员自我评估与专家评估冷陷阱息肉切除能力的一致性。
目的:许多受术者缺乏进行冷陷阱息肉切除术(CSP)的能力,可能需要使用评估工具(如冷陷阱息肉切除术评估工具(CSPAT))进行更长的观察期。然而,这些工具并不常用于繁忙的学术内窥镜检查实践。本研究评估受训人员CSP自我评估与专家评估的一致性,并评估与一致性相关的因素。方法:2017年8月至2020年2月,由美国和新加坡4个不同学术机构的8名盲法专家使用cspit对2所机构胃肠病学学员的连续csp进行视频记录和评分。学员在程序后立即对每个CSP的能力进行自我评估。学员和培训师之间的一致性以能力(得分为3或4)或尚未能力(得分为1或2)的一致性百分比报告。结果:22名学员进行了765次结肠镜检查,其中2267名csp。1380名csp的专家能力评估与实习生能力评估一致(60.9%;95% ci, 58.8%-62.9%;加权κ = 0.12;95% ci, 0.08-0.16)。541名csp学员被低估能力(23.9%);95% CI, 22.1%-25.7%)和326名csp的能力被高估(15.3%;95% ci, 13.8%-16.8%)。私人执业胃肠科职业规划(调整优势比0.40;95% CI, 0.17-0.92)和研究前较低的结肠镜检查容积(校正优势比,0.35;95% CI, 0.22-0.62)与专家和受训人员能力评估一致性较低的可能性独立相关。结构化反馈与一致性无关,并且随着受训人员获得经验而没有变化;然而,反馈降低了高估的比例。结论:学员自我评价与培训师评价的一致性较差。自我评估可以作为能力评估的初始部分,然后应该与外部评估相协调,以提高评估的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信