Compassion in the justification of physician-assisted dying: Gandhi's non-violence vs. Aristotle's virtues and vices.

IF 2.3 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Ercan Avci
{"title":"Compassion in the justification of physician-assisted dying: Gandhi's non-violence vs. Aristotle's virtues and vices.","authors":"Ercan Avci","doi":"10.1007/s11019-025-10251-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compassion is an essential phenomenon in the therapeutic relationship, and some use it to justify physician-assisted dying practices. The value of compassion in the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients is undeniable. However, different approaches to its definition and scope can lead to distinct conclusions about the role of compassion in end-of-life interventions. In this context, the paper aims to compare Mahatma Gandhi's and Aristotle's views on compassion to explore whether it can be utilized to justify physician-assisted dying. Gandhi's thoughts on compassion and Aristotle's standpoint on virtues and vices demonstrate that Gandhi evaluates this concept as a moral duty to relieve intractable suffering, whereas Aristotle relies on balancing all virtues through relevant deficiencies and excesses. Therefore, even though Gandhi's opinion on compassion can for allow assisted dying interventions, Aristotle's idea of virtues and vices restricts compassion to a scope that alleviates suffering through available means without causing death.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10251-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compassion is an essential phenomenon in the therapeutic relationship, and some use it to justify physician-assisted dying practices. The value of compassion in the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients is undeniable. However, different approaches to its definition and scope can lead to distinct conclusions about the role of compassion in end-of-life interventions. In this context, the paper aims to compare Mahatma Gandhi's and Aristotle's views on compassion to explore whether it can be utilized to justify physician-assisted dying. Gandhi's thoughts on compassion and Aristotle's standpoint on virtues and vices demonstrate that Gandhi evaluates this concept as a moral duty to relieve intractable suffering, whereas Aristotle relies on balancing all virtues through relevant deficiencies and excesses. Therefore, even though Gandhi's opinion on compassion can for allow assisted dying interventions, Aristotle's idea of virtues and vices restricts compassion to a scope that alleviates suffering through available means without causing death.

为医生协助下的死亡辩护时的同情:甘地的非暴力与亚里士多德的美德与罪恶。
同情是治疗关系中的一个基本现象,有些人用它来证明医生协助死亡的做法是正当的。在医护人员和病人之间的关系中,同情心的价值是不可否认的。然而,对其定义和范围的不同方法可能导致关于同情在临终干预中的作用的不同结论。在此背景下,本文旨在比较圣雄甘地和亚里士多德对同情的看法,以探讨是否可以利用它来证明医生协助死亡的合理性。甘地关于同情的思想和亚里士多德关于美德与罪恶的立场表明,甘地将同情的概念视为一种减轻难以解决的痛苦的道德责任,而亚里士多德则依赖于通过相关的不足和过度来平衡所有美德。因此,尽管甘地关于同情的观点可以允许辅助死亡干预,但亚里士多德关于美德和罪恶的观点将同情限制在通过可用手段减轻痛苦而不会导致死亡的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信