Effect of Time-Lapse Incubation System on In Vitro Development of Alpaca Embryos.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Cendy Lutz Ccasa Ccahuana, Pedro Walter Bravo Matheus, Ying Liu, Guiulfo Duriel Mamani-Mango
{"title":"Effect of Time-Lapse Incubation System on In Vitro Development of Alpaca Embryos.","authors":"Cendy Lutz Ccasa Ccahuana, Pedro Walter Bravo Matheus, Ying Liu, Guiulfo Duriel Mamani-Mango","doi":"10.1111/rda.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, incubators with a time-lapse system are widely used for in vitro embryo production in several species, however, their effect on alpaca embryo development compared to conventional incubators remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare early in vitro embryo development in alpacas using a time-lapse incubator system versus a conventional incubator. Ovaries were obtained from a slaughterhouse and 1048 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected and in vitro matured for 26 h in either a time-lapse system (n = 542) or a conventional incubator (n = 542). All the matured COCs were fertilised for 24 h with fresh spermatozoa recovered from epididymis obtained from the slaughterhouse. The presumptive zygotes in both systems were cultured in a commercial one-step culture medium, and the embryo development was evaluated at 48, 120 and 168 h after fertilisation. Our results showed no differences in maturation rates between the time-lapse system and the conventional incubator (79.9% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.080). Cleavage rates at 48 h were also similar between the time-lapse and conventional systems: 20.5% vs. 20.8% for embryos at the two- to four-cell stage, and 6.0% vs. 7.0% for embryos above the four-cell stage (p > 0.05). At 120 h after fertilisation, the percentage of embryos were more evenly distributed across all stages (below eight-cell, eight-cell and above eight-cell stages) in both systems (p > 0.05). At 168 h, no differences in the blastocyst rates and blastocyst quality were observed between the time-lapse and conventional systems. In conclusion, in vitro embryo production in alpacas can be successfully carried out using the time-lapse incubation system or a conventional incubator with comparable results. Further study would focus on the correlation between the developmental patterns and the quality of alpaca embryos, as well as the comparison of in vivo embryo development between the two incubation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21035,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","volume":"60 2","pages":"e70008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, incubators with a time-lapse system are widely used for in vitro embryo production in several species, however, their effect on alpaca embryo development compared to conventional incubators remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare early in vitro embryo development in alpacas using a time-lapse incubator system versus a conventional incubator. Ovaries were obtained from a slaughterhouse and 1048 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected and in vitro matured for 26 h in either a time-lapse system (n = 542) or a conventional incubator (n = 542). All the matured COCs were fertilised for 24 h with fresh spermatozoa recovered from epididymis obtained from the slaughterhouse. The presumptive zygotes in both systems were cultured in a commercial one-step culture medium, and the embryo development was evaluated at 48, 120 and 168 h after fertilisation. Our results showed no differences in maturation rates between the time-lapse system and the conventional incubator (79.9% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.080). Cleavage rates at 48 h were also similar between the time-lapse and conventional systems: 20.5% vs. 20.8% for embryos at the two- to four-cell stage, and 6.0% vs. 7.0% for embryos above the four-cell stage (p > 0.05). At 120 h after fertilisation, the percentage of embryos were more evenly distributed across all stages (below eight-cell, eight-cell and above eight-cell stages) in both systems (p > 0.05). At 168 h, no differences in the blastocyst rates and blastocyst quality were observed between the time-lapse and conventional systems. In conclusion, in vitro embryo production in alpacas can be successfully carried out using the time-lapse incubation system or a conventional incubator with comparable results. Further study would focus on the correlation between the developmental patterns and the quality of alpaca embryos, as well as the comparison of in vivo embryo development between the two incubation systems.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproduction in Domestic Animals
Reproduction in Domestic Animals 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal offers comprehensive information concerning physiology, pathology, and biotechnology of reproduction. Topical results are currently published in original papers, reviews, and short communications with particular attention to investigations on practicable techniques. Carefully selected reports, e. g. on embryo transfer and associated biotechnologies, gene transfer, and spermatology provide a link between basic research and clinical application. The journal applies to breeders, veterinarians, and biologists, and is also of interest in human medicine. Interdisciplinary cooperation is documented in the proceedings of the joint annual meetings. Fields of interest: Animal reproduction and biotechnology with special regard to investigations on applied and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信