ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-Built Assessment: A Quantitative Scale for the Era of Teleneurology.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200432
Christina N Fournier, Mark Levine, Karon Simmons, Rocío Carolina García-Santibáñez, Anne Rowland, Colin C Quinn, Doreen T Ho, Richard S Bedlack, Jonathan D Glass
{"title":"ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-Built Assessment: A Quantitative Scale for the Era of Teleneurology.","authors":"Christina N Fournier, Mark Levine, Karon Simmons, Rocío Carolina García-Santibáñez, Anne Rowland, Colin C Quinn, Doreen T Ho, Richard S Bedlack, Jonathan D Glass","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Telemedicine has become a mainstay of ALS clinical care, but there is currently no standardized approach for assessing and tracking changes to the neurologic examination in this format. The goal of this study was to create a standardized telemedicine-based motor examination scale to objectively and reliably track ALS progression and use Rasch methodology to validate the scale and improve its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A draft telemedicine examination scale with 25 items assessing movement in the bulbar muscles, neck, trunk, and extremities was created by an ALS expert panel, incorporating input from patient advisors. This prospective, observational study was approved by the Emory IRB, and participants provided informed consent. Adults with a diagnosis of ALS who were able to undergo a video telemedicine evaluation by an Emory clinician were eligible for participation. Rasch analyses were performed to determine the final item responses and optimize the scoring structure. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subset of participants through 2 separate examinations by 2 different examiners within a 7-day period. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations with simultaneously administered Rasch-built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) and revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-built assessment was administered to a total of 258 PALS representing the full spectrum of a typical ALS clinic population. After performing Rasch analyses, 3 items were removed and item response categories were consolidated for 8 items. The final 22-item ALS MOTOR scale conformed to Rasch model criteria. The inter-rater reliability was 95%. The ALS MOTOR had a 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83) correlation with ALSFRS-R and 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.85) correlation with ROADS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ALS MOTOR is a novel, accessible tool for remotely and objectively tracking ALS progression for both clinical care and research studies. Use of Rasch methodology for scale validation allowed for optimization of scale psychometric properties, which is particularly important when using the sum score as an overall outcome measure. Longitudinal and external validation studies are ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 2","pages":"e200432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Telemedicine has become a mainstay of ALS clinical care, but there is currently no standardized approach for assessing and tracking changes to the neurologic examination in this format. The goal of this study was to create a standardized telemedicine-based motor examination scale to objectively and reliably track ALS progression and use Rasch methodology to validate the scale and improve its psychometric properties.

Methods: A draft telemedicine examination scale with 25 items assessing movement in the bulbar muscles, neck, trunk, and extremities was created by an ALS expert panel, incorporating input from patient advisors. This prospective, observational study was approved by the Emory IRB, and participants provided informed consent. Adults with a diagnosis of ALS who were able to undergo a video telemedicine evaluation by an Emory clinician were eligible for participation. Rasch analyses were performed to determine the final item responses and optimize the scoring structure. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subset of participants through 2 separate examinations by 2 different examiners within a 7-day period. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations with simultaneously administered Rasch-built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) and revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R).

Results: The ALS Motor Observational Telemedicine Objective Rasch-built assessment was administered to a total of 258 PALS representing the full spectrum of a typical ALS clinic population. After performing Rasch analyses, 3 items were removed and item response categories were consolidated for 8 items. The final 22-item ALS MOTOR scale conformed to Rasch model criteria. The inter-rater reliability was 95%. The ALS MOTOR had a 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83) correlation with ALSFRS-R and 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.85) correlation with ROADS.

Discussion: The ALS MOTOR is a novel, accessible tool for remotely and objectively tracking ALS progression for both clinical care and research studies. Use of Rasch methodology for scale validation allowed for optimization of scale psychometric properties, which is particularly important when using the sum score as an overall outcome measure. Longitudinal and external validation studies are ongoing.

肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)运动观察远程医疗目的:一种远程神经病学时代的定量量表。
背景和目的:远程医疗已成为ALS临床护理的支柱,但目前还没有标准化的方法来评估和跟踪这种形式的神经系统检查的变化。本研究的目的是创建一个标准化的基于远程医疗的运动检查量表,以客观可靠地跟踪ALS的进展,并使用Rasch方法验证量表并改善其心理测量特性。方法:ALS专家小组结合患者顾问的意见,制定了一份包含25个项目的远程医疗检查量表草案,评估球肌、颈部、躯干和四肢的运动。这项前瞻性观察性研究获得Emory IRB批准,参与者提供知情同意。被诊断为ALS的成年人,如果能够接受埃默里临床医生的视频远程医疗评估,就有资格参加。Rasch分析确定最终项目的反应和优化评分结构。在7天的时间内,通过2位不同的考官进行2次单独的测试来评估一部分参与者的重测信度。通过计算同时使用的rasch构建的ALS总体残疾量表(ROADS)和修订的ALS功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)的相关性来评估结构效度。结果:肌萎缩侧索硬化运动观察远程医疗目的:对258名pal进行rassch构建评估,代表了典型肌萎缩侧索硬化临床人群的全谱。在进行Rasch分析后,删除了3个项目,合并了8个项目的项目反应类别。最终的22项ALS MOTOR量表符合Rasch模型标准。评估者间信度为95%。ALS MOTOR与ALSFRS-R的相关性为0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83),与ROADS的相关性为0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.85)。讨论:ALS MOTOR是一种新颖的、易于获取的工具,用于远程和客观地跟踪临床护理和研究的ALS进展。使用Rasch方法进行量表验证,可以优化量表心理测量特性,这在使用总和分数作为总体结果测量时尤为重要。纵向和外部验证研究正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信