Incidence of Wounds Associated with Posterior Midline Incision for Achilles Tendon Pathology in a Large Cohort at a Tertiary Care Center.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael J Hurst, Hannah J Hughes, Cody Blazek, Ryan J Lerch, Patrick R Burns, Jeffrey Manway
{"title":"Incidence of Wounds Associated with Posterior Midline Incision for Achilles Tendon Pathology in a Large Cohort at a Tertiary Care Center.","authors":"Michael J Hurst, Hannah J Hughes, Cody Blazek, Ryan J Lerch, Patrick R Burns, Jeffrey Manway","doi":"10.7547/22-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to determine the wound complications associated with a straight midline incision overlying the Achilles tendon. Data on sex, age, body mass index (BMI), surgery performed, date of surgery, and wound development were collected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data on 217 patients with a mean ± SD age of 46.16 ± 13.72 years and follow-up of 9.1 ± 12.42 months. The specific procedures performed with this incision included repair of ruptured Achilles tendon (n = 89), Haglund deformity correction (n = 75), and flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (n = 63). Wound complication was defined as a delay in wound healing with necrosis of the incisional margins resulting in exposure of superficial or deep layers. Deep infection was defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reported 15 wound complications (6.91%): ten (4.6%) were superficial and five (2.3%) were deep. All five patients with deep wound complications required operative debridement, and four patients required intravenous antibiotics. The infection rate of the midline incisional approach was 1.83%. Superficial wound complications were treated with local care and oral antibiotics, as necessary. There were no significant differences between age (P = .5986; P < .05), BMI (P = .7968; P < .05), smoking history (P = .6356; P < .05), or length of follow-up (P = .8338; P < .05). The overall wound rate of 6.91% is comparable with other literature with larger cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results will help us better educate surgeons about the risk of wound development with the posterior midline Achilles tendon incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"114 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/22-123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine the wound complications associated with a straight midline incision overlying the Achilles tendon. Data on sex, age, body mass index (BMI), surgery performed, date of surgery, and wound development were collected.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data on 217 patients with a mean ± SD age of 46.16 ± 13.72 years and follow-up of 9.1 ± 12.42 months. The specific procedures performed with this incision included repair of ruptured Achilles tendon (n = 89), Haglund deformity correction (n = 75), and flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (n = 63). Wound complication was defined as a delay in wound healing with necrosis of the incisional margins resulting in exposure of superficial or deep layers. Deep infection was defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics.

Results: We reported 15 wound complications (6.91%): ten (4.6%) were superficial and five (2.3%) were deep. All five patients with deep wound complications required operative debridement, and four patients required intravenous antibiotics. The infection rate of the midline incisional approach was 1.83%. Superficial wound complications were treated with local care and oral antibiotics, as necessary. There were no significant differences between age (P = .5986; P < .05), BMI (P = .7968; P < .05), smoking history (P = .6356; P < .05), or length of follow-up (P = .8338; P < .05). The overall wound rate of 6.91% is comparable with other literature with larger cohorts.

Conclusions: These results will help us better educate surgeons about the risk of wound development with the posterior midline Achilles tendon incision.

三级医疗中心大队列跟腱病理后中线切口相关伤口的发生率
背景:我们试图确定跟腱上的直中线切口相关的伤口并发症。收集性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、手术情况、手术日期和伤口发育情况等数据。方法:回顾性收集217例患者资料,平均±SD年龄46.16±13.72岁,随访9.1±12.42个月。该切口的具体手术包括跟腱断裂修复(n = 89)、Haglund畸形矫正(n = 75)和拇长屈肌腱转移(n = 63)。伤口并发症定义为伤口愈合延迟,切口边缘坏死,导致浅层或深层暴露。深度感染被定义为需要静脉注射抗生素。结果:报告15例创面并发症(6.91%),其中浅表10例(4.6%),深部5例(2.3%)。5例深创面并发症患者均需手术清创,4例患者需静脉注射抗生素。中线切口入路感染率为1.83%。浅表伤口并发症在必要时给予局部护理和口服抗生素治疗。年龄间差异无统计学意义(P = .5986;P < 0.05), bmi (P = .7968;P < 0.05)、吸烟史(P = .6356;P < 0.05),或随访时间(P = .8338;P < 0.05)。总体创伤率为6.91%,与其他具有更大队列的文献相当。结论:这些结果将有助于我们更好地教育外科医生关于跟腱后中线切口伤口发展的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信