Emergency medicine pharmacists' interventions in the tertiary hospitals' emergency departments in Malaysia.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2457410
Hock Peng Koh, Haliza Ab Jalal, Yee Ping Koo, Mary Siew Yng Chen, Manimegahlai Selvaratanam, Anaanthan Bhuvanendran Pillai, Wai Kit Wong, Xin Nee Guee, Sherene Su Ann Tan, Shirlyn Tan, Lih Jiuan Teh, Rosalind Guen Lin Sia
{"title":"Emergency medicine pharmacists' interventions in the tertiary hospitals' emergency departments in Malaysia.","authors":"Hock Peng Koh, Haliza Ab Jalal, Yee Ping Koo, Mary Siew Yng Chen, Manimegahlai Selvaratanam, Anaanthan Bhuvanendran Pillai, Wai Kit Wong, Xin Nee Guee, Sherene Su Ann Tan, Shirlyn Tan, Lih Jiuan Teh, Rosalind Guen Lin Sia","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2457410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist is an integrated part of the Emergency Department (ED) interdisciplinary team in many countries, including Malaysia. The presence of EM pharmacists in the ED has positively impacted patient outcomes. Data on EM pharmacists' interventions is scarce in the Asian region. In Malaysia, data on interventions done by EM pharmacists in the EDs was unavailable. This study aimed to assess the type of interventions done by EM pharmacists in the ED of tertiary public hospitals in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, multicenter study involved EM pharmacists from 14 tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. All accepted interventions done by EM pharmacists in the ED for patients admitted to the Red (critical) and Yellow (semi-critical) zones from January to June 2022 were extracted from the Clinical Pharmacy Report Form. All data were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EM pharmacists documented 1659 accepted interventions on 1584 patients during the study period. Inappropriate regimens (<i>n</i> = 1117, 67.3%) and incomplete prescriptions (<i>n</i> = 339, 20.4%) were the main categories of accepted interventions in ED. Inappropriate drug (<i>n</i> = 574, 34.6%), dose (<i>n</i> = 292, 17.6%), and frequency (<i>n</i> = 176, 10.6%) were the top three subcategory interventions documented under inappropriate regimens. Antimicrobials, antihypertensives, and proton pump inhibitors were the commonest drug intervened under the categories of inappropriate drug intervention. There were 272 (16.4%) accepted interventions on high-alert medications (HAMs). Insulin, enoxaparin, and noradrenaline were the most intervened HAMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inappropriate treatment regimens were the most common intervention category done by EM pharmacists in Malaysia. The significant number of interventions done by EM pharmacists demonstrated the importance of EM pharmacists as integral members of the EM team. This data can help improve the quality of clinical pharmacy services in the ED and is important for the future expansion of clinical pharmacy services in all EDs across Malaysia, neighbouring countries, and other developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2457410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2457410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist is an integrated part of the Emergency Department (ED) interdisciplinary team in many countries, including Malaysia. The presence of EM pharmacists in the ED has positively impacted patient outcomes. Data on EM pharmacists' interventions is scarce in the Asian region. In Malaysia, data on interventions done by EM pharmacists in the EDs was unavailable. This study aimed to assess the type of interventions done by EM pharmacists in the ED of tertiary public hospitals in Malaysia.

Methods: This cross-sectional, multicenter study involved EM pharmacists from 14 tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. All accepted interventions done by EM pharmacists in the ED for patients admitted to the Red (critical) and Yellow (semi-critical) zones from January to June 2022 were extracted from the Clinical Pharmacy Report Form. All data were analyzed descriptively.

Results: The EM pharmacists documented 1659 accepted interventions on 1584 patients during the study period. Inappropriate regimens (n = 1117, 67.3%) and incomplete prescriptions (n = 339, 20.4%) were the main categories of accepted interventions in ED. Inappropriate drug (n = 574, 34.6%), dose (n = 292, 17.6%), and frequency (n = 176, 10.6%) were the top three subcategory interventions documented under inappropriate regimens. Antimicrobials, antihypertensives, and proton pump inhibitors were the commonest drug intervened under the categories of inappropriate drug intervention. There were 272 (16.4%) accepted interventions on high-alert medications (HAMs). Insulin, enoxaparin, and noradrenaline were the most intervened HAMs.

Conclusion: Inappropriate treatment regimens were the most common intervention category done by EM pharmacists in Malaysia. The significant number of interventions done by EM pharmacists demonstrated the importance of EM pharmacists as integral members of the EM team. This data can help improve the quality of clinical pharmacy services in the ED and is important for the future expansion of clinical pharmacy services in all EDs across Malaysia, neighbouring countries, and other developing countries.

马来西亚三级医院急诊科急诊药师的干预。
背景:急诊医学(EM)药剂师是包括马来西亚在内的许多国家急诊科(ED)跨学科团队的一个组成部分。急诊药剂师在急诊科的存在对患者的预后有积极的影响。在亚洲地区,关于新兴市场药剂师干预措施的数据很少。在马来西亚,急诊药剂师在急诊科进行干预的数据是无法获得的。本研究旨在评估在马来西亚三级公立医院的急诊药剂师所做的干预类型。方法:这项横断面、多中心研究涉及马来西亚14家三级医院的急诊药剂师。从临床药学报告表中提取了2022年1月至6月期间急诊药剂师对入住红色(危急)和黄色(半危急)区域的患者所接受的所有干预措施。对所有数据进行描述性分析。结果:在研究期间,EM药剂师记录了1584例患者的1659例接受干预措施。不适宜的方案(n = 1117, 67.3%)和不完整的处方(n = 339, 20.4%)是ED可接受的干预措施的主要类别,不适宜的药物(n = 574, 34.6%)、剂量(n = 292, 17.6%)和频次(n = 176, 10.6%)是ED可接受干预措施的前三大类。在不适当药物干预类别中,抗菌药、降压药和质子泵抑制剂是最常见的干预药物。有272名(16.4%)接受了高警戒性药物(HAMs)的干预。胰岛素、依诺肝素和去甲肾上腺素是干预最多的ham。结论:不适当的治疗方案是马来西亚EM药剂师最常见的干预类别。EM药剂师所做的大量干预表明EM药剂师作为EM团队不可或缺的成员的重要性。这些数据可以帮助提高急诊科的临床药学服务质量,对马来西亚、邻国和其他发展中国家所有急诊科的临床药学服务的未来扩展非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信