Performance of Optic Disc Optical Coherence Tomography Normative Database in a Large, Diverse, Real-World Cohort.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rithambara Ramachandran, Ming-Chen Lu, Leslie M Niziol, Maria A Woodward, Angela R Elam, Leroy Johnson, Martha Kershaw, David C Musch, Amanda Bicket, Denise John, Sarah Dougherty Wood, Amy Zhang, Jason Zhang, Joan O'Brien, Paula Anne Newman-Casey
{"title":"Performance of Optic Disc Optical Coherence Tomography Normative Database in a Large, Diverse, Real-World Cohort.","authors":"Rithambara Ramachandran, Ming-Chen Lu, Leslie M Niziol, Maria A Woodward, Angela R Elam, Leroy Johnson, Martha Kershaw, David C Musch, Amanda Bicket, Denise John, Sarah Dougherty Wood, Amy Zhang, Jason Zhang, Joan O'Brien, Paula Anne Newman-Casey","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>Current optical coherence tomography normative sample data may not represent diverse human optic nerve anatomy to accurately classify all individuals with true glaucomatous optic neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare optic nerve head (ONH) measurements between published values from an optical coherence tomography (OCT) normative database and a more diverse cohort of healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>ONH parameters from healthy participants of the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine (MI-SIGHT) program and the Topcon Maestro-1 normative cohort were compared. Chi-square tests compared MI-SIGHT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) quadrant color-code labels with the expected distribution and multinomial logistic regression identified factors associated with label classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1084 MI-SIGHT and 399 Topcon eyes were evaluated. The MI-SIGHT cohort was older (54 v 46 y), with more individuals identifying as Black (61% v 20%), less as Hispanic (4% v 18%), and spherical equivalents closer to plano (-0.6 v -1.2 diopters) compared to the Topcon cohort (all P<0.001). Black/African American MI-SIGHT participants had larger cup-to-disc ratios and cup volumes, while White MI-SIGHT participants had smaller ONH values, except for rim area and rim volume, compared to Topcon participants (all P<0.001). The MI-SIGHT cohort's RNFL color codes did not follow the expected distribution (P<0.05); more MI-SIGHT RNFL quadrant measurements were assigned as white (10.6% and 6.3% MI-SIGHT v 5% Topcon) and red codes (2.2% and 1.8% MI-SIGHT v <1% Topcon) than expected in the superior and inferior quadrants respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCT normative databases should accurately reflect diverse populations to avoid misclassification by RNFL thickness color codes. Larger datasets should be leveraged to encompass the full spectrum of healthy optic nerve anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precis: Current optical coherence tomography normative sample data may not represent diverse human optic nerve anatomy to accurately classify all individuals with true glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Purpose: To compare optic nerve head (ONH) measurements between published values from an optical coherence tomography (OCT) normative database and a more diverse cohort of healthy individuals.

Patients and methods: ONH parameters from healthy participants of the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine (MI-SIGHT) program and the Topcon Maestro-1 normative cohort were compared. Chi-square tests compared MI-SIGHT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) quadrant color-code labels with the expected distribution and multinomial logistic regression identified factors associated with label classifications.

Results: 1084 MI-SIGHT and 399 Topcon eyes were evaluated. The MI-SIGHT cohort was older (54 v 46 y), with more individuals identifying as Black (61% v 20%), less as Hispanic (4% v 18%), and spherical equivalents closer to plano (-0.6 v -1.2 diopters) compared to the Topcon cohort (all P<0.001). Black/African American MI-SIGHT participants had larger cup-to-disc ratios and cup volumes, while White MI-SIGHT participants had smaller ONH values, except for rim area and rim volume, compared to Topcon participants (all P<0.001). The MI-SIGHT cohort's RNFL color codes did not follow the expected distribution (P<0.05); more MI-SIGHT RNFL quadrant measurements were assigned as white (10.6% and 6.3% MI-SIGHT v 5% Topcon) and red codes (2.2% and 1.8% MI-SIGHT v <1% Topcon) than expected in the superior and inferior quadrants respectively.

Conclusion: OCT normative databases should accurately reflect diverse populations to avoid misclassification by RNFL thickness color codes. Larger datasets should be leveraged to encompass the full spectrum of healthy optic nerve anatomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信