Assessment of a New CT Detector and Filtration Technology: Part 1 - X-ray Beam Characterization and Radiation Dosimetry.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Izabella Barreto, Nathalie Correa, Patricia Moser, Ibrahim Tuna, Tara Massini, Lynn Rill, Manuel Arreola
{"title":"Assessment of a New CT Detector and Filtration Technology: Part 1 - X-ray Beam Characterization and Radiation Dosimetry.","authors":"Izabella Barreto, Nathalie Correa, Patricia Moser, Ibrahim Tuna, Tara Massini, Lynn Rill, Manuel Arreola","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated beam quality and radiation dosimetry of a CT scanner equipped with a novel detector and filtration technology called PureVision Optics (PVO). PVO features miniaturized electronics, a detector cut with microblade technology, and increased filtration in order to increase x-ray detection and reduce image noise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the performance of two similar 320-detector CT scanners: one equipped with PVO and one without. Beam quality was measured by determining the half-value layer (HVL) and effective energy (Eeff) for both scanners using all tube voltages (80 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV, 135 kV) and bowtie filters (small, medium, large) available. Energy correction factors were identified for optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDS) compared to a calibrated ionization chamber. Surface and internal doses were measured for an anthropomorphic CT angiography head phantom and a cadaver head scanned with CTDIvol matched as close as possible at the conventional (55.1 mGy) and PVO (55.4 mGy) CT scanners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all scan settings, the PVO scanner showed significantly higher HVL (range, 4.33-11.02 mm Al) and effective energy (range, 39.4-68.0 keV) values compared to the conventional scanner (HVL, 4.19-8.25 mm Al; effective energy, 38.4-55.2 keV). For equivalent CTDIvol values, the energy-corrected surface skin and lens doses were on average 6.7% lower with the PVO scanner than the conventional scanner (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVO technology yielded higher HVL and effective energies and, for the same CTDIvol, resulted in lower surface organ doses, indicating a potential for reduced patient radiation exposure in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated beam quality and radiation dosimetry of a CT scanner equipped with a novel detector and filtration technology called PureVision Optics (PVO). PVO features miniaturized electronics, a detector cut with microblade technology, and increased filtration in order to increase x-ray detection and reduce image noise.

Methods: We assessed the performance of two similar 320-detector CT scanners: one equipped with PVO and one without. Beam quality was measured by determining the half-value layer (HVL) and effective energy (Eeff) for both scanners using all tube voltages (80 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV, 135 kV) and bowtie filters (small, medium, large) available. Energy correction factors were identified for optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDS) compared to a calibrated ionization chamber. Surface and internal doses were measured for an anthropomorphic CT angiography head phantom and a cadaver head scanned with CTDIvol matched as close as possible at the conventional (55.1 mGy) and PVO (55.4 mGy) CT scanners.

Results: For all scan settings, the PVO scanner showed significantly higher HVL (range, 4.33-11.02 mm Al) and effective energy (range, 39.4-68.0 keV) values compared to the conventional scanner (HVL, 4.19-8.25 mm Al; effective energy, 38.4-55.2 keV). For equivalent CTDIvol values, the energy-corrected surface skin and lens doses were on average 6.7% lower with the PVO scanner than the conventional scanner (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: PVO technology yielded higher HVL and effective energies and, for the same CTDIvol, resulted in lower surface organ doses, indicating a potential for reduced patient radiation exposure in clinical settings.

一种新的CT检测器和过滤技术的评估:第1部分- x射线束表征和辐射剂量学。
目的:本研究评估了一种配备新型检测器和过滤技术的CT扫描仪的光束质量和辐射剂量学,称为PureVision Optics (PVO)。PVO的特点是微型化电子设备,采用微刀片技术切割的探测器,并增加了过滤,以增加x射线探测和降低图像噪声。方法:我们评估了两种类似的320探测器CT扫描仪的性能:一种配备了PVO,一种没有。通过测量两种扫描仪的半值层(HVL)和有效能量(Eeff)来测量光束质量,使用所有管电压(80 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV, 135 kV)和领结滤波器(小,中,大)。与校准电离室相比,确定了光激发发光剂量计(OSLDS)的能量校正因子。对拟人化CT血管成像的头部幻影和用CTDIvol扫描的尸体头部进行表面和内部剂量测量,在常规(55.1 mGy)和PVO (55.4 mGy) CT扫描仪上尽可能接近。结果:在所有扫描设置中,PVO扫描仪显示的HVL(范围4.33-11.02 mm Al)和有效能量(范围39.4-68.0 keV)值明显高于常规扫描仪(HVL, 4.19-8.25 mm Al;有效能量,38.4-55.2 keV)。对于相同的CTDIvol值,PVO扫描仪的能量校正表面皮肤和晶状体剂量平均比传统扫描仪低6.7% (P结论:PVO技术产生更高的HVL和有效能量,并且在相同的CTDIvol下,导致更低的表面器官剂量,表明在临床环境中可能减少患者的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信