Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
De-Xin Zeng, Ruo-Nan Liu, Xian-Kun Ren, Peng Zhang, Ling-Han Tang, Ling Tan, Rehman Zia Ur, Mao-Ru Zhao, Peng Guo, Pan Zhang, Jun Du, Xian Qin, Shi-Yan Wan, Lu-Qian Deng, Ya-Jun Luo, Zi-Lin Liu, Jiang-Wei Xiao
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"De-Xin Zeng, Ruo-Nan Liu, Xian-Kun Ren, Peng Zhang, Ling-Han Tang, Ling Tan, Rehman Zia Ur, Mao-Ru Zhao, Peng Guo, Pan Zhang, Jun Du, Xian Qin, Shi-Yan Wan, Lu-Qian Deng, Ya-Jun Luo, Zi-Lin Liu, Jiang-Wei Xiao","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is considered to be the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, the risk of adverse events and postoperative recurrence remains significant. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) compared with nCRT in patients with LARC and to assess the possibility of eliminating radiotherapy on the basis of guaranteed efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of nCRT and nCT for LARC. The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2706 patients from seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the nCT and nCRT groups. This study demonstrated a lower rate of infection (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.82; P = 0.005), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), tumor regression grade (TRG) 0-1 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36-0.69; P < 0.0001), preventive diverting ileostomy (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-1.02; P = 0.05), and leukopenia (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25-1.01; P = 0.05) in the nCT group. However, there was no significant difference in the other toxic events, such as intestinal obstruction, urinary complications, diarrhea, and surgical or pathological outcomes, such as clinical fistula, sphincter preservation, postoperative mortality (≤ 60 d), R0 resection, ypStage 0-I, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), or pathological complete response (pCR) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that OS and DFS were not lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT group. In addition, the nCT group had fewer complications. Preoperative nCT is expected to become a standard treatment option for most patients with stage II-III LARC. It is worth noting that radiotherapy cannot be ignored for some patients who need to ensure the conversion effect of neoadjuvant therapy and strongly request to preserve organ function.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2686-2696"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is considered to be the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, the risk of adverse events and postoperative recurrence remains significant. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) compared with nCRT in patients with LARC and to assess the possibility of eliminating radiotherapy on the basis of guaranteed efficacy.

Materials and methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of nCRT and nCT for LARC. The study protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

Results: A total of 2706 patients from seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between the nCT and nCRT groups. This study demonstrated a lower rate of infection (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.82; P = 0.005), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), tumor regression grade (TRG) 0-1 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36-0.69; P < 0.0001), preventive diverting ileostomy (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-1.02; P = 0.05), and leukopenia (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25-1.01; P = 0.05) in the nCT group. However, there was no significant difference in the other toxic events, such as intestinal obstruction, urinary complications, diarrhea, and surgical or pathological outcomes, such as clinical fistula, sphincter preservation, postoperative mortality (≤ 60 d), R0 resection, ypStage 0-I, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), or pathological complete response (pCR) between the two groups.

Conclusion: This study indicated that OS and DFS were not lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT group. In addition, the nCT group had fewer complications. Preoperative nCT is expected to become a standard treatment option for most patients with stage II-III LARC. It is worth noting that radiotherapy cannot be ignored for some patients who need to ensure the conversion effect of neoadjuvant therapy and strongly request to preserve organ function.

局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗的疗效比较:随机对照试验的meta分析。
背景:术前新辅助放化疗(nCRT)被认为是局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗策略;然而,不良事件和术后复发的风险仍然很大。本研究旨在评价LARC患者新辅助化疗(nCT)与非辅助化疗(nCRT)的非劣效性,并在保证疗效的基础上评估消除放疗的可能性。材料和方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以确定比较nCRT和nCT治疗LARC疗效的随机对照试验(RCTs)。该研究方案已在前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)上注册。结果:来自7项研究的2706名患者被纳入meta分析。nCT组和nCRT组的总生存期(OS)或无病生存期(DFS)无显著差异。该研究显示较低的感染率(OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.34-0.82;P = 0.005),吻合的泄漏(OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.34 - -0.87;P = 0.01),肿瘤回归年级(丹)0 - 1 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.36 - -0.69;P < 0.0001),预防性回肠分流造口术(OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17-1.02;P = 0.05)和白血球减少症(OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25 - -1.01;P = 0.05)。然而,在其他毒性事件,如肠梗阻、泌尿系统并发症、腹泻,以及手术或病理结果,如临床瘘、括约肌保存、术后死亡率(≤60 d)、R0切除、ypStage 0-I、环切缘阳性(CRM +)或病理完全缓解(pCR)方面,两组间无显著差异。结论:nCT组的OS和DFS均不低于nCRT组。此外,nCT组并发症较少。术前nCT有望成为大多数II-III期LARC患者的标准治疗选择。值得注意的是,对于一些需要保证新辅助治疗转化效果,强烈要求保留器官功能的患者,放疗是不可忽视的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信