The efficacy of diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, nifedipine, minoxidil, and lidocaine for the medical management of anal fissure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Cong Wang, Jing Ni, Yi Xiong, Jinlan Chen, Binting Li, Li Xu
{"title":"The efficacy of diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, nifedipine, minoxidil, and lidocaine for the medical management of anal fissure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Cong Wang, Jing Ni, Yi Xiong, Jinlan Chen, Binting Li, Li Xu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anal fissure (AF) is a common anorectal condition causing pain, bleeding, and other perianal discomfort. This study conducts a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and side effect profiles of pharmacological treatments for AF, including diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, nifedipine, minoxidil, and Lidocaine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical treatments for AF were sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline. The primary outcome was AF healing, with secondary outcomes including recurrence rates, pain reduction (visual analog scale), and adverse effects. Statistical analysis utilized odds ratios and SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking) values for treatment ranking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,770 participants were included in the analysis. Nifedipine demonstrated the highest healing rate, followed by diltiazem and minoxidil. Lidocaine exhibited the lowest healing rate. Diltiazem had the lowest recurrence rate and was the most effective in pain reduction, whereas lidocaine had the highest recurrence rate and was the least effective in alleviating pain. The incidence of adverse effects with minoxidil was relatively low, second only to lidocaine, while glyceryl trinitrate had the highest rate of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nifedipine had the highest healing rate and should be considered as a first-line non-surgical treatment for anal fissures. Given the elevated incidence of adverse reactions associated with nitroglycerin, its use should be avoided in order to minimize the risk of significant toxicities and side effects. Additionally, because of its outstanding analgesic properties, diltiazem is recommended as the preferred option for patients with heightened sensitivity to pain, but more studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anal fissure (AF) is a common anorectal condition causing pain, bleeding, and other perianal discomfort. This study conducts a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and side effect profiles of pharmacological treatments for AF, including diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, nifedipine, minoxidil, and Lidocaine.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical treatments for AF were sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline. The primary outcome was AF healing, with secondary outcomes including recurrence rates, pain reduction (visual analog scale), and adverse effects. Statistical analysis utilized odds ratios and SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking) values for treatment ranking.

Results: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,770 participants were included in the analysis. Nifedipine demonstrated the highest healing rate, followed by diltiazem and minoxidil. Lidocaine exhibited the lowest healing rate. Diltiazem had the lowest recurrence rate and was the most effective in pain reduction, whereas lidocaine had the highest recurrence rate and was the least effective in alleviating pain. The incidence of adverse effects with minoxidil was relatively low, second only to lidocaine, while glyceryl trinitrate had the highest rate of adverse effects.

Conclusion: Nifedipine had the highest healing rate and should be considered as a first-line non-surgical treatment for anal fissures. Given the elevated incidence of adverse reactions associated with nitroglycerin, its use should be avoided in order to minimize the risk of significant toxicities and side effects. Additionally, because of its outstanding analgesic properties, diltiazem is recommended as the preferred option for patients with heightened sensitivity to pain, but more studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信