Advancing presurgical non-invasive spread through air spaces prediction in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence and CT signatures.
Guanchao Ye, Guangyao Wu, Yiying Li, Chi Zhang, Lili Qin, Jianlin Wu, Jun Fan, Yu Qi, Fan Yang, Yongde Liao
{"title":"Advancing presurgical non-invasive spread through air spaces prediction in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence and CT signatures.","authors":"Guanchao Ye, Guangyao Wu, Yiying Li, Chi Zhang, Lili Qin, Jianlin Wu, Jun Fan, Yu Qi, Fan Yang, Yongde Liao","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1511024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To accurately identify spread through air spaces (STAS) in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, our study developed a non-invasive and interpretable biomarker combining clinical and radiomics features using preoperative CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a cohort of 1,325 lung adenocarcinoma patients from three centers, which was divided into four groups: a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 930), a testing cohort (<i>n</i> = 238), an external validation 1 cohort (<i>n</i> = 93), and 2 cohort (<i>n</i> = 64). We collected clinical characteristics and semantic features, and extracted radiomics features. We utilized the LightGBM algorithm to construct prediction models using the selected features. Quantifying the contribution of radiomics features of CT to prediction model using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. The models' performance was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training cohort, the clinical model achieved an AUC value of 0.775, the radiomics model achieved an AUC value of 0.836, and the combined model achieved an AUC value of 0.837. In the testing cohort, the AUC values of the models were 0.743, 0.755, and 0.768. In the external validation 1 cohort, the AUC values of the models were 0.717, 0.758, and 0.765, while in the external validation 2 cohort, 0.725, 0.726 and 0.746. The DeLong test results indicated that the combined model outperformed the clinical model (<i>p</i> < 0.05). DCA indicated that the models provided a net benefit in predicting STAS. The SHAP algorithm explains the contribution of each feature in the model, visually demonstrating the impact of each feature on the model's decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined model has the potential to serve as a biomarker for predicting STAS using preoperative CT scans, determining the appropriate surgical strategy, and guiding the extent of resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1511024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1511024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To accurately identify spread through air spaces (STAS) in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, our study developed a non-invasive and interpretable biomarker combining clinical and radiomics features using preoperative CT.
Methods: The study included a cohort of 1,325 lung adenocarcinoma patients from three centers, which was divided into four groups: a training cohort (n = 930), a testing cohort (n = 238), an external validation 1 cohort (n = 93), and 2 cohort (n = 64). We collected clinical characteristics and semantic features, and extracted radiomics features. We utilized the LightGBM algorithm to construct prediction models using the selected features. Quantifying the contribution of radiomics features of CT to prediction model using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. The models' performance was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: In the training cohort, the clinical model achieved an AUC value of 0.775, the radiomics model achieved an AUC value of 0.836, and the combined model achieved an AUC value of 0.837. In the testing cohort, the AUC values of the models were 0.743, 0.755, and 0.768. In the external validation 1 cohort, the AUC values of the models were 0.717, 0.758, and 0.765, while in the external validation 2 cohort, 0.725, 0.726 and 0.746. The DeLong test results indicated that the combined model outperformed the clinical model (p < 0.05). DCA indicated that the models provided a net benefit in predicting STAS. The SHAP algorithm explains the contribution of each feature in the model, visually demonstrating the impact of each feature on the model's decisions.
Conclusion: The combined model has the potential to serve as a biomarker for predicting STAS using preoperative CT scans, determining the appropriate surgical strategy, and guiding the extent of resection.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.