Cannabinoids for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Víctor Hugo González Cárdenas, Mariafernanda Valdivieso Díaz, Carlos Felipe Mateus Almeciga, Juan Carlos Echeverry Carrillo, Juan Carlos López Trujillo, Angela Rocío Hernández Arenas, Jorge Luis Paternina Rojas
{"title":"Cannabinoids for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials","authors":"Víctor Hugo González Cárdenas,&nbsp;Mariafernanda Valdivieso Díaz,&nbsp;Carlos Felipe Mateus Almeciga,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Echeverry Carrillo,&nbsp;Juan Carlos López Trujillo,&nbsp;Angela Rocío Hernández Arenas,&nbsp;Jorge Luis Paternina Rojas","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Poor acute postoperative pain control, coupled with the use of intravenous medications with a limited and unsafety efficacy spectrum, has led to new therapeutic alternative explorations to reduce adverse events while increasing its analgesic efficacy. There cannabinoids have been proposed as a useful control agent in post-surgical pain. Nevertheless, to date, there is no solid evidence to evaluate them. The current article sought to determine cannabinoids' effectiveness and safety in the aforementioned context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review of controlled clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. The study was structured under the Cochrane recommendations. Primary outcomes included: pain intensity reduction, the number and doses of rescue analgesics and adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 62 articles found, only five were included. Four of them presented high inter-observer agreement and 60% were classified as having a low risk of bias. When evaluating the objectives of each article, a disparity was found in the investigative methods and terms implemented. Due to the heterogeneity of methods, it was not possible to carry out meta-analytic evaluations and only qualitative evaluations were feasible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite finding contradictory evidence in relation to the analgesic cannabis effect in the postoperative context, methodological disparities found in the included articles and the impossibility of performing collective quantitative analyses were more significant. Before concluding with the well-known sentence: “further intervention studies are necessary”, this report has identified limitations and has proposed recommendations for the planning and execution of future cannabis clinical trials, which will support new and necessary evidence for stronger meta-analytic reviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The management of severe pain after surgery, and the use of intravenous drugs with limited and potentially unsafe effectiveness, has led to the exploration of new treatment options to minimize side effects while improving pain relief. Cannabinoids have been suggested as a potential solution for managing post-surgical pain, but there is currently insufficient evidence to assess their effectiveness. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cannabinoids in this context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Poor acute postoperative pain control, coupled with the use of intravenous medications with a limited and unsafety efficacy spectrum, has led to new therapeutic alternative explorations to reduce adverse events while increasing its analgesic efficacy. There cannabinoids have been proposed as a useful control agent in post-surgical pain. Nevertheless, to date, there is no solid evidence to evaluate them. The current article sought to determine cannabinoids' effectiveness and safety in the aforementioned context.

Methods

A systematic review of controlled clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. The study was structured under the Cochrane recommendations. Primary outcomes included: pain intensity reduction, the number and doses of rescue analgesics and adverse events.

Results

Of 62 articles found, only five were included. Four of them presented high inter-observer agreement and 60% were classified as having a low risk of bias. When evaluating the objectives of each article, a disparity was found in the investigative methods and terms implemented. Due to the heterogeneity of methods, it was not possible to carry out meta-analytic evaluations and only qualitative evaluations were feasible.

Conclusions

Despite finding contradictory evidence in relation to the analgesic cannabis effect in the postoperative context, methodological disparities found in the included articles and the impossibility of performing collective quantitative analyses were more significant. Before concluding with the well-known sentence: “further intervention studies are necessary”, this report has identified limitations and has proposed recommendations for the planning and execution of future cannabis clinical trials, which will support new and necessary evidence for stronger meta-analytic reviews.

Significance

The management of severe pain after surgery, and the use of intravenous drugs with limited and potentially unsafe effectiveness, has led to the exploration of new treatment options to minimize side effects while improving pain relief. Cannabinoids have been suggested as a potential solution for managing post-surgical pain, but there is currently insufficient evidence to assess their effectiveness. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cannabinoids in this context.

大麻素用于急性术后疼痛管理:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:术后急性疼痛控制不佳,加上静脉注射药物的疗效谱有限且不安全,导致了新的治疗替代探索,以减少不良事件,同时提高其镇痛效果。大麻素被认为是一种有效的控制术后疼痛的药物。然而,到目前为止,还没有可靠的证据来评估它们。目前的文章试图确定大麻素在上述背景下的有效性和安全性。方法:系统回顾对照临床试验,评价大麻素治疗急性术后疼痛的有效性和安全性。这项研究是根据Cochrane的建议进行的。主要结局包括:疼痛强度降低、救援镇痛药的数量和剂量以及不良事件。结果:在检索到的62篇文献中,仅有5篇被纳入。其中4个表现出高度的观察者间一致性,60%被归类为具有低偏倚风险。在评估每篇文章的目标时,在调查方法和实施条件方面发现了差异。由于方法的异质性,无法进行meta分析评价,只能进行定性评价。结论:尽管在术后背景下发现了与大麻镇痛作用相关的相互矛盾的证据,但在所纳入的文章中发现的方法学差异和不可能进行集体定量分析更为显著。在以“进一步的干预研究是必要的”这句众所周知的句子结束之前,该报告已经确定了局限性,并为未来大麻临床试验的规划和执行提出了建议,这将为更有力的元分析评论提供新的必要证据。意义:手术后严重疼痛的处理,以及静脉注射有限且可能不安全的药物的使用,促使人们探索新的治疗方案,以尽量减少副作用,同时改善疼痛缓解。大麻素被认为是治疗术后疼痛的潜在解决方案,但目前没有足够的证据来评估其有效性。本文的目的是评估大麻素在这种情况下的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信