Deep Learning-Based Precontrast CT Parcellation for MRI-Free Brain Amyloid PET Quantification.

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kyobin Choo, Jaehoon Joo, Sangwon Lee, Daesung Kim, Hyunkeong Lim, Dongwoo Kim, Seongjin Kang, Seong Jae Hwang, Mijin Yun
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Precontrast CT Parcellation for MRI-Free Brain Amyloid PET Quantification.","authors":"Kyobin Choo, Jaehoon Joo, Sangwon Lee, Daesung Kim, Hyunkeong Lim, Dongwoo Kim, Seongjin Kang, Seong Jae Hwang, Mijin Yun","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for brain region parcellation using CT data from PET/CT scans to enable accurate amyloid quantification in 18F-FBB PET/CT without relying on high-resolution MRI.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of PET/CT and T1-weighted MRI pairs from 226 individuals (157 with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and 69 healthy controls) was used. The dataset was split into training/validation (60%) and test (40%) sets. Utilizing auto-generated segmentation labels, 3 UNets were independently trained for multiplanar brain parcellation on CT and subsequently ensembled. Amyloid load was measured across 46 volumes of interest (VOIs), derived from the Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas. Dice similarity coefficient between the proposed CT-based DL model and MRI-based (FreeSurfer) method was calculated, with SUVR comparison using linear regression analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient. Global SUVRs were also compared within groups with clinical dementia ratings (CDRs) of 0, 0.5, and 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL-based CT parcellation achieved mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.80 for all 46 VOIs, 0.72 for 16 cortical and limbic VOIs, and 0.83 for 30 subcortical VOIs. For regional and global SUVR comparisons, the linear regression yielded a slope, y-intercept, and R2 of 1 ± 0.027, 0 ± 0.040, and ≧0.976, respectively (P < 0.001), and the intraclass correlation coefficient was ≧0.988 (P < 0.001). For global SUVRs in each CDR group, these values were 1 ± 0.020, 0 ± 0.026, ≧0.993, and ≧0.996, respectively (P < 0.001). Both MRI-based and CT-based global SUVR showed a consistent increase as the CDR score increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL-based CT parcellation agrees strongly with MRI-based methods for amyloid PET quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for brain region parcellation using CT data from PET/CT scans to enable accurate amyloid quantification in 18F-FBB PET/CT without relying on high-resolution MRI.

Patients and methods: A retrospective dataset of PET/CT and T1-weighted MRI pairs from 226 individuals (157 with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and 69 healthy controls) was used. The dataset was split into training/validation (60%) and test (40%) sets. Utilizing auto-generated segmentation labels, 3 UNets were independently trained for multiplanar brain parcellation on CT and subsequently ensembled. Amyloid load was measured across 46 volumes of interest (VOIs), derived from the Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas. Dice similarity coefficient between the proposed CT-based DL model and MRI-based (FreeSurfer) method was calculated, with SUVR comparison using linear regression analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient. Global SUVRs were also compared within groups with clinical dementia ratings (CDRs) of 0, 0.5, and 1.

Results: The DL-based CT parcellation achieved mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.80 for all 46 VOIs, 0.72 for 16 cortical and limbic VOIs, and 0.83 for 30 subcortical VOIs. For regional and global SUVR comparisons, the linear regression yielded a slope, y-intercept, and R2 of 1 ± 0.027, 0 ± 0.040, and ≧0.976, respectively (P < 0.001), and the intraclass correlation coefficient was ≧0.988 (P < 0.001). For global SUVRs in each CDR group, these values were 1 ± 0.020, 0 ± 0.026, ≧0.993, and ≧0.996, respectively (P < 0.001). Both MRI-based and CT-based global SUVR showed a consistent increase as the CDR score increased.

Conclusions: The DL-based CT parcellation agrees strongly with MRI-based methods for amyloid PET quantification.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信