Searching for sexually transmitted infections by midstream urine pooling after exclusion of urinary tract infection: A cost-effectiveness analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
María Jesús Castaño , Javier Guillem , Juan José Ripoll , David Navarro , Eliseo Albert
{"title":"Searching for sexually transmitted infections by midstream urine pooling after exclusion of urinary tract infection: A cost-effectiveness analysis","authors":"María Jesús Castaño ,&nbsp;Javier Guillem ,&nbsp;Juan José Ripoll ,&nbsp;David Navarro ,&nbsp;Eliseo Albert","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI), <em>Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium,</em> and <em>Trichomonas vaginalis</em> in patients with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) but negative urine cultures, using a pooled sampling method. A cohort of 200 patients was analyzed. A decision tree model based on cost-effectiveness was used to evaluate the following five diagnostic strategies: (A) no screening;(B) screening only men;(C) screening only women;(D) screening men and women with high leukocyte counts (&gt;70cells/µL);(E) screening all men and women. The pooling method reduced reagent testing costs by 75 %. The most cost-effective strategy was screening men and women with high leukocyte counts, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 489.05euros. STI screening using pooled midstream urine samples in patients with suspected UTI and negative urine cultures is cost-effective, particularly when targeting individuals with high leukocyte counts. This approach optimizes resource use and improves early STI detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"111 3","pages":"Article 116700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325000239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI), Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis in patients with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) but negative urine cultures, using a pooled sampling method. A cohort of 200 patients was analyzed. A decision tree model based on cost-effectiveness was used to evaluate the following five diagnostic strategies: (A) no screening;(B) screening only men;(C) screening only women;(D) screening men and women with high leukocyte counts (>70cells/µL);(E) screening all men and women. The pooling method reduced reagent testing costs by 75 %. The most cost-effective strategy was screening men and women with high leukocyte counts, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 489.05euros. STI screening using pooled midstream urine samples in patients with suspected UTI and negative urine cultures is cost-effective, particularly when targeting individuals with high leukocyte counts. This approach optimizes resource use and improves early STI detection.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信