Understanding patient safety during earthquakes: a phenomenological study of disaster response.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tunçay Palteki, Saleh Salimi, Ahtisham Younas, Selahattin Taylan, Emre Aydın
{"title":"Understanding patient safety during earthquakes: a phenomenological study of disaster response.","authors":"Tunçay Palteki, Saleh Salimi, Ahtisham Younas, Selahattin Taylan, Emre Aydın","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural hazards, such as earthquakes, pose a significant risk to both the public and healthcare professionals, jeopardising patient safety due to the disruption of healthcare systems and services. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of healthcare professionals concerning patient safety during natural hazards, specifically earthquakes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, the study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. 23 participants, including doctors, nurses and paramedics, were interviewed using purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Ethical approval was obtained, and Colaizzi's method was used for data analysis, with findings validated through researcher consensus and participant feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine overarching themes emerged, such as the emotional toll of communication breakdowns, struggles with patient identification, stress due to resource scarcity, operational chaos, ethical dilemmas and psychological impacts on both patients and staff. The study found that these factors collectively influenced patient safety during the earthquake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The emotional strain caused by communication failures, patient identification issues and resource shortages compounded the challenges of providing safe care during the earthquake. Strengthening disaster preparedness through improved communication systems, resource management, psychological support, interagency coordination and regular realistic disaster drills is essential for safeguarding patient safety in future disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Natural hazards, such as earthquakes, pose a significant risk to both the public and healthcare professionals, jeopardising patient safety due to the disruption of healthcare systems and services. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of healthcare professionals concerning patient safety during natural hazards, specifically earthquakes.

Methods: Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, the study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. 23 participants, including doctors, nurses and paramedics, were interviewed using purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Ethical approval was obtained, and Colaizzi's method was used for data analysis, with findings validated through researcher consensus and participant feedback.

Results: Nine overarching themes emerged, such as the emotional toll of communication breakdowns, struggles with patient identification, stress due to resource scarcity, operational chaos, ethical dilemmas and psychological impacts on both patients and staff. The study found that these factors collectively influenced patient safety during the earthquake.

Conclusion: The emotional strain caused by communication failures, patient identification issues and resource shortages compounded the challenges of providing safe care during the earthquake. Strengthening disaster preparedness through improved communication systems, resource management, psychological support, interagency coordination and regular realistic disaster drills is essential for safeguarding patient safety in future disasters.

了解地震期间的病人安全:灾难反应的现象学研究。
背景:地震等自然灾害对公众和卫生保健专业人员都构成重大风险,由于卫生保健系统和服务的中断而危及患者安全。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员在自然灾害(特别是地震)期间对患者安全的生活经验。方法:采用描述性现象学方法,本研究遵循定性研究报告综合标准指南。采用有目的抽样对包括医生、护士和护理人员在内的23名参与者进行了访谈。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,这些访谈被录音并转录。获得伦理批准,并采用Colaizzi的方法进行数据分析,通过研究者共识和参与者反馈验证研究结果。结果:出现了9个主要主题,如沟通障碍带来的情绪损失、与患者身份认同的斗争、资源短缺带来的压力、操作混乱、道德困境以及对患者和工作人员的心理影响。研究发现,这些因素共同影响了地震期间患者的安全。结论:沟通失败、患者身份识别问题和资源短缺导致的情绪紧张加剧了地震期间提供安全护理的挑战。通过改进通信系统、资源管理、心理支持、机构间协调和定期的现实灾害演习来加强备灾,对于在未来灾害中保障患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信