Evaluation of the Effect of Aeration Tubes and Holes on Soil Gas Exchange Using a Simulation Model

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Katharina Weltecke, Oliver Löwe, Thorsten Gaertig
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of Aeration Tubes and Holes on Soil Gas Exchange Using a Simulation Model","authors":"Katharina Weltecke,&nbsp;Oliver Löwe,&nbsp;Thorsten Gaertig","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A prevalent strategy to mitigate the negative impacts of soil compaction or sealing on urban trees involves installing aeration tubes, aeration holes or near surface aeration horizons to enhance gas exchange between the soil air and the atmosphere. Despite their widespread use, there is currently no scientific evidence confirming their effectiveness. In this study, gas exchange between the atmosphere and soils that were aerated using different methods was modelled and evaluated in the laboratory and in the field. Both the laboratory and field measurements could be modelled well with the simulation model. The research showed that the effectiveness of aeration tubes and holes is highly dependent on the air-filled porosity of the soil. The more gas exchange can take place via the soil pores, the lesser the influence of the aeration equipment. Thus, the use of aeration tubes is not necessary when using tree substrates in unsealed tree pits but could mitigate disturbances in soil aeration in compacted and fine-grained soils with low air capacity. However, modelling shows that the effect of aeration tubes and holes is less than expected and that near-surface aeration layers are generally more effective than vertical aeration systems. With the help of the modelling of gas exchange as presented here, it is possible to optimise the level of aeration of the soil depending on the existing degree of compaction and/or the planned surface sealing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A prevalent strategy to mitigate the negative impacts of soil compaction or sealing on urban trees involves installing aeration tubes, aeration holes or near surface aeration horizons to enhance gas exchange between the soil air and the atmosphere. Despite their widespread use, there is currently no scientific evidence confirming their effectiveness. In this study, gas exchange between the atmosphere and soils that were aerated using different methods was modelled and evaluated in the laboratory and in the field. Both the laboratory and field measurements could be modelled well with the simulation model. The research showed that the effectiveness of aeration tubes and holes is highly dependent on the air-filled porosity of the soil. The more gas exchange can take place via the soil pores, the lesser the influence of the aeration equipment. Thus, the use of aeration tubes is not necessary when using tree substrates in unsealed tree pits but could mitigate disturbances in soil aeration in compacted and fine-grained soils with low air capacity. However, modelling shows that the effect of aeration tubes and holes is less than expected and that near-surface aeration layers are generally more effective than vertical aeration systems. With the help of the modelling of gas exchange as presented here, it is possible to optimise the level of aeration of the soil depending on the existing degree of compaction and/or the planned surface sealing.

Abstract Image

用模拟模型评价曝气管和气孔对土壤气体交换的影响
减轻土壤压实或密封对城市树木的负面影响的普遍策略包括安装通气管、通气孔或近地表通气层,以加强土壤空气和大气之间的气体交换。尽管它们被广泛使用,但目前还没有科学证据证实它们的有效性。在本研究中,在实验室和实地模拟和评估了使用不同方法加气的大气和土壤之间的气体交换。该模拟模型可以很好地模拟室内和现场的测量结果。研究表明,曝气管和曝气孔的有效性高度依赖于土壤的充气孔隙度。通过土壤孔隙进行的气体交换越多,曝气设备的影响就越小。因此,在不密封的树坑中使用树木基质时,不需要使用曝气管,但可以减轻空气容量低的密实和细粒土壤对土壤通气的干扰。然而,建模表明,曝气管和曝气孔的效果不如预期,近地表曝气层通常比垂直曝气系统更有效。在这里展示的气体交换模型的帮助下,可以根据现有的压实程度和/或计划的表面密封来优化土壤的通气性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信