Benzodiazepine-Free Cardiac Anesthesia for Reduction of Postoperative Delirium: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jessica Spence,P J Devereaux,Shun-Fu Lee,Frédérick D'Aragon,Michael S Avidan,Richard P Whitlock,C David Mazer,Nicolas Rousseau-Saine,Raja Ramaswamy Rajamohan,Kane O Pryor,Rael Klein,Edmund Tan,Matthew J Cameron,Emily Di Sante,Erin DeBorba,Mary E Mustard,Etienne J Couture,Raffael Pereira Cezar Zamper,Michael W Y Law,George Djaiani,Tarit Saha,Stephen Choi,Peter Hedlin,D Ryan Pikaluk,Wing Lam,Alain Deschamps,Chinthanie F Ramasundarahettige,Jessica Vincent,William F McIntyre,Simon J W Oczkowski,Braden J Dulong,Christopher Beaver,Shelley A Kloppenburg,Andre Lamy,Eric Jacobsohn,Emilie P Belley-Côté,
{"title":"Benzodiazepine-Free Cardiac Anesthesia for Reduction of Postoperative Delirium: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.","authors":"Jessica Spence,P J Devereaux,Shun-Fu Lee,Frédérick D'Aragon,Michael S Avidan,Richard P Whitlock,C David Mazer,Nicolas Rousseau-Saine,Raja Ramaswamy Rajamohan,Kane O Pryor,Rael Klein,Edmund Tan,Matthew J Cameron,Emily Di Sante,Erin DeBorba,Mary E Mustard,Etienne J Couture,Raffael Pereira Cezar Zamper,Michael W Y Law,George Djaiani,Tarit Saha,Stephen Choi,Peter Hedlin,D Ryan Pikaluk,Wing Lam,Alain Deschamps,Chinthanie F Ramasundarahettige,Jessica Vincent,William F McIntyre,Simon J W Oczkowski,Braden J Dulong,Christopher Beaver,Shelley A Kloppenburg,Andre Lamy,Eric Jacobsohn,Emilie P Belley-Côté,","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nDelirium is common after cardiac surgery and associated with adverse outcomes. Intraoperative benzodiazepines may increase postoperative delirium but restricting intraoperative benzodiazepines has not yet been evaluated in a randomized trial.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo determine whether an institutional policy of restricted intraoperative benzodiazepine administration reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis pragmatic, multiperiod, patient- and assessor-blinded, cluster randomized crossover trial took place at 20 North American cardiac surgical centers. All adults undergoing open cardiac surgery at participating centers during the trial period were included through a waiver of individual patient consent between November 2019 and December 2022.\r\n\r\nIntervention\r\nInstitutional policies of restrictive vs liberal intraoperative benzodiazepine administration were compared. Hospitals (clusters) were randomized to cross between the restricted and liberal benzodiazepine policies 12 to 18 times over 4-week periods.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 72 hours of surgery as detected in routine clinical care, using either the Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Intraoperative awareness by patient report was assessed as an adverse event.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nDuring the trial, 19 768 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [12] years; 14 528 [73.5%] male) underwent cardiac surgery, 9827 during restricted benzodiazepine periods and 9941 during liberal benzodiazepine periods. During restricted periods, clinicians adhered to assigned policy in 8928 patients (90.9%), compared to 9268 patients (93.2%) during liberal periods. Delirium occurred in 1373 patients (14.0%) during restricted periods and 1485 (14.9%) during liberal periods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01; P = .07). No patient spontaneously reported intraoperative awareness.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn intention-to-treat analyses, restricting benzodiazepines during cardiac surgery did not reduce delirium incidence but was also not associated with an increase in the incidence of patient-reported intraoperative awareness. Given that smaller effect sizes cannot be ruled out, restriction of benzodiazepines during cardiac surgery may be considered. Research is required to determine whether restricting intraoperative benzodiazepines at the patient level can reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928236.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Delirium is common after cardiac surgery and associated with adverse outcomes. Intraoperative benzodiazepines may increase postoperative delirium but restricting intraoperative benzodiazepines has not yet been evaluated in a randomized trial. Objective To determine whether an institutional policy of restricted intraoperative benzodiazepine administration reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic, multiperiod, patient- and assessor-blinded, cluster randomized crossover trial took place at 20 North American cardiac surgical centers. All adults undergoing open cardiac surgery at participating centers during the trial period were included through a waiver of individual patient consent between November 2019 and December 2022. Intervention Institutional policies of restrictive vs liberal intraoperative benzodiazepine administration were compared. Hospitals (clusters) were randomized to cross between the restricted and liberal benzodiazepine policies 12 to 18 times over 4-week periods. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 72 hours of surgery as detected in routine clinical care, using either the Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Intraoperative awareness by patient report was assessed as an adverse event. Results During the trial, 19 768 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [12] years; 14 528 [73.5%] male) underwent cardiac surgery, 9827 during restricted benzodiazepine periods and 9941 during liberal benzodiazepine periods. During restricted periods, clinicians adhered to assigned policy in 8928 patients (90.9%), compared to 9268 patients (93.2%) during liberal periods. Delirium occurred in 1373 patients (14.0%) during restricted periods and 1485 (14.9%) during liberal periods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01; P = .07). No patient spontaneously reported intraoperative awareness. Conclusions and Relevance In intention-to-treat analyses, restricting benzodiazepines during cardiac surgery did not reduce delirium incidence but was also not associated with an increase in the incidence of patient-reported intraoperative awareness. Given that smaller effect sizes cannot be ruled out, restriction of benzodiazepines during cardiac surgery may be considered. Research is required to determine whether restricting intraoperative benzodiazepines at the patient level can reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928236.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信