{"title":"Drought-induced water use patterns in epiphytic ferns and orchids of the Hainan tropical cloud forest, South China","authors":"Liangyu Wen, Dexu Zhang, Chuchu Xiao, Guang Feng, Ewuketu Linger, Wenxing Long","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how epiphytic vascular plants respond to drought is essential for elucidating the potential mechanisms that may contribute to their resilience in the context of global climate change. Despite numerous studies have estimated tropical epiphytic vascular plants’ water source and use efficiency, their response to drought induced water scarcity poorly understood. We conducted an <em>in-situ</em> water reduction control experiment (<em>i.e.,</em> controlling rain and fog water, each with three treatments) on epiphytic vascular plant communities in a biodiverse hotspots region of Hainan tropical cloud forest. We then investigated the water sources and water use efficiency (WUE) of epiphytic vascular plants under different drought gradients. We found a significant seasonal variation in water sources: 63 %–67 % in the dry season (November to April of the next year) and 64 %–70 % in the wet season (May to October) came from fog and rain, respectively In the wet season, epiphytic ferns utilized 39 % fog and 61 % rain, while orchids utilized 31 % fog and 69 % rain. Ferns absorbed significantly more fog water than orchids under all drought gradients. In the dry season, 63 % of the water in epiphytic ferns and 64 % in orchids originated from fog, while 37 % and 36 % from rain for ephiphytic ferns and orchids respectively. The WUE of ferns was significantly higher than that of orchids under all drought gradients. These findings reveal that both epiphytic vascular plant communities and epiphytic taxa display selective and complementary water uptake strategies, with distinct differences in water use strategy between epiphytic ferns and orchids.","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how epiphytic vascular plants respond to drought is essential for elucidating the potential mechanisms that may contribute to their resilience in the context of global climate change. Despite numerous studies have estimated tropical epiphytic vascular plants’ water source and use efficiency, their response to drought induced water scarcity poorly understood. We conducted an in-situ water reduction control experiment (i.e., controlling rain and fog water, each with three treatments) on epiphytic vascular plant communities in a biodiverse hotspots region of Hainan tropical cloud forest. We then investigated the water sources and water use efficiency (WUE) of epiphytic vascular plants under different drought gradients. We found a significant seasonal variation in water sources: 63 %–67 % in the dry season (November to April of the next year) and 64 %–70 % in the wet season (May to October) came from fog and rain, respectively In the wet season, epiphytic ferns utilized 39 % fog and 61 % rain, while orchids utilized 31 % fog and 69 % rain. Ferns absorbed significantly more fog water than orchids under all drought gradients. In the dry season, 63 % of the water in epiphytic ferns and 64 % in orchids originated from fog, while 37 % and 36 % from rain for ephiphytic ferns and orchids respectively. The WUE of ferns was significantly higher than that of orchids under all drought gradients. These findings reveal that both epiphytic vascular plant communities and epiphytic taxa display selective and complementary water uptake strategies, with distinct differences in water use strategy between epiphytic ferns and orchids.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.