Drought-induced water use patterns in epiphytic ferns and orchids of the Hainan tropical cloud forest, South China

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Liangyu Wen, Dexu Zhang, Chuchu Xiao, Guang Feng, Ewuketu Linger, Wenxing Long
{"title":"Drought-induced water use patterns in epiphytic ferns and orchids of the Hainan tropical cloud forest, South China","authors":"Liangyu Wen, Dexu Zhang, Chuchu Xiao, Guang Feng, Ewuketu Linger, Wenxing Long","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how epiphytic vascular plants respond to drought is essential for elucidating the potential mechanisms that may contribute to their resilience in the context of global climate change. Despite numerous studies have estimated tropical epiphytic vascular plants’ water source and use efficiency, their response to drought induced water scarcity poorly understood. We conducted an <em>in-situ</em> water reduction control experiment (<em>i.e.,</em> controlling rain and fog water, each with three treatments) on epiphytic vascular plant communities in a biodiverse hotspots region of Hainan tropical cloud forest. We then investigated the water sources and water use efficiency (WUE) of epiphytic vascular plants under different drought gradients. We found a significant seasonal variation in water sources: 63 %–67 % in the dry season (November to April of the next year) and 64 %–70 % in the wet season (May to October) came from fog and rain, respectively In the wet season, epiphytic ferns utilized 39 % fog and 61 % rain, while orchids utilized 31 % fog and 69 % rain. Ferns absorbed significantly more fog water than orchids under all drought gradients. In the dry season, 63 % of the water in epiphytic ferns and 64 % in orchids originated from fog, while 37 % and 36 % from rain for ephiphytic ferns and orchids respectively. The WUE of ferns was significantly higher than that of orchids under all drought gradients. These findings reveal that both epiphytic vascular plant communities and epiphytic taxa display selective and complementary water uptake strategies, with distinct differences in water use strategy between epiphytic ferns and orchids.","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how epiphytic vascular plants respond to drought is essential for elucidating the potential mechanisms that may contribute to their resilience in the context of global climate change. Despite numerous studies have estimated tropical epiphytic vascular plants’ water source and use efficiency, their response to drought induced water scarcity poorly understood. We conducted an in-situ water reduction control experiment (i.e., controlling rain and fog water, each with three treatments) on epiphytic vascular plant communities in a biodiverse hotspots region of Hainan tropical cloud forest. We then investigated the water sources and water use efficiency (WUE) of epiphytic vascular plants under different drought gradients. We found a significant seasonal variation in water sources: 63 %–67 % in the dry season (November to April of the next year) and 64 %–70 % in the wet season (May to October) came from fog and rain, respectively In the wet season, epiphytic ferns utilized 39 % fog and 61 % rain, while orchids utilized 31 % fog and 69 % rain. Ferns absorbed significantly more fog water than orchids under all drought gradients. In the dry season, 63 % of the water in epiphytic ferns and 64 % in orchids originated from fog, while 37 % and 36 % from rain for ephiphytic ferns and orchids respectively. The WUE of ferns was significantly higher than that of orchids under all drought gradients. These findings reveal that both epiphytic vascular plant communities and epiphytic taxa display selective and complementary water uptake strategies, with distinct differences in water use strategy between epiphytic ferns and orchids.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信