Introduction of a Fallow Year to Continuous Rice Systems Enhances Crop Soil Nitrogen Uptake

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Zhenglin Zhang, Daniel C. Olk, Bruce A. Linquist
{"title":"Introduction of a Fallow Year to Continuous Rice Systems Enhances Crop Soil Nitrogen Uptake","authors":"Zhenglin Zhang,&nbsp;Daniel C. Olk,&nbsp;Bruce A. Linquist","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rice grown in California constitutes 20% of total U.S. rice production and is typically grown in a continuous rice monoculture system. In recent years, growers have been forced to fallow their lands often due to winter droughts leading to water restrictions or spring rains leading to prevented planting. Increased soil aeration due to fallowing creates knowledge gaps in soil nitrogen (N) availability. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate differences in crop N uptake between rice cultivation following a fallow season, fallow rice (FR) and continuous rice (CR) systems. Crop uptake of soil N (N uptake<sub>soil</sub>) and fertiliser N (N uptake<sub>fertilizer</sub>) were quantified using <sup>15</sup>N-enriched ammonium sulfate applied in microplots as a preplant (150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) or topdress (30 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) application. In both seasons when N was applied as a preplant fertiliser, the FR treatment had a higher grain yield than did the CR treatment, with yield differences of 2.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2021 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and 1.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2022 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Examining the sources of crop N uptake for preplant applied N, on average, N uptake<sub>soil</sub> in the FR treatment was 16.7 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> higher than the CR treatment at maturity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, N uptake<sub>fertilizer</sub> was similar between treatments. Additionally, comparable soil and crop fertiliser N recoveries in CR and FR preplant N suggested that the pathways and magnitudes of fertiliser N losses were similar in both systems. These results indicate that N uptake<sub>soil</sub> was primarily responsible for lower N uptake in CR. Similar results were found when N was applied as a topdress, where FR had increased N uptake<sub>soil</sub> in both years. We further investigated the reason for lower rates of N uptake<sub>soil</sub> in CR. Soil phenols, which have been documented to accumulate in continuously flooded rice systems and stabilise soil N, were quantified in the field study. Complementing the rigorous field study, a regional survey study that incorporated nine paired fields was conducted to quantify regional phenol levels. In both the field and the regional survey studies, soil phenols were higher in CR than in FR fields. Together, higher phenol levels and lower N uptake<sub>soil</sub> in CR provide mechanistic evidence that the introduction of a season-long fallow to continuous rice systems enhances soil N availability by reducing organic substrate recalcitrance. Future work should identify the duration needed for soil phenol accumulation to impair soil N cycling under continuous rice cultivation, as well as any roles of soil microbial populations in these soil N cycling patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice grown in California constitutes 20% of total U.S. rice production and is typically grown in a continuous rice monoculture system. In recent years, growers have been forced to fallow their lands often due to winter droughts leading to water restrictions or spring rains leading to prevented planting. Increased soil aeration due to fallowing creates knowledge gaps in soil nitrogen (N) availability. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate differences in crop N uptake between rice cultivation following a fallow season, fallow rice (FR) and continuous rice (CR) systems. Crop uptake of soil N (N uptakesoil) and fertiliser N (N uptakefertilizer) were quantified using 15N-enriched ammonium sulfate applied in microplots as a preplant (150 kg N ha−1) or topdress (30 kg N ha−1) application. In both seasons when N was applied as a preplant fertiliser, the FR treatment had a higher grain yield than did the CR treatment, with yield differences of 2.3 Mg ha−1 in 2021 (p < 0.05) and 1.7 Mg ha−1 in 2022 (p < 0.05). Examining the sources of crop N uptake for preplant applied N, on average, N uptakesoil in the FR treatment was 16.7 kg N ha−1 higher than the CR treatment at maturity (p < 0.05). In contrast, N uptakefertilizer was similar between treatments. Additionally, comparable soil and crop fertiliser N recoveries in CR and FR preplant N suggested that the pathways and magnitudes of fertiliser N losses were similar in both systems. These results indicate that N uptakesoil was primarily responsible for lower N uptake in CR. Similar results were found when N was applied as a topdress, where FR had increased N uptakesoil in both years. We further investigated the reason for lower rates of N uptakesoil in CR. Soil phenols, which have been documented to accumulate in continuously flooded rice systems and stabilise soil N, were quantified in the field study. Complementing the rigorous field study, a regional survey study that incorporated nine paired fields was conducted to quantify regional phenol levels. In both the field and the regional survey studies, soil phenols were higher in CR than in FR fields. Together, higher phenol levels and lower N uptakesoil in CR provide mechanistic evidence that the introduction of a season-long fallow to continuous rice systems enhances soil N availability by reducing organic substrate recalcitrance. Future work should identify the duration needed for soil phenol accumulation to impair soil N cycling under continuous rice cultivation, as well as any roles of soil microbial populations in these soil N cycling patterns.

Abstract Image

在水稻连作系统中引入休耕年提高作物土壤氮素吸收
加州种植的水稻占美国水稻总产量的20%,通常采用连续的水稻单一栽培系统。近年来,由于冬季干旱导致用水限制或春季降雨导致种植受阻,种植者被迫休耕。休耕导致的土壤通气量增加造成了土壤氮(N)有效性方面的知识空白。进行了一项为期两年的田间研究,以评估休耕季后水稻种植、休耕稻(FR)和连作稻(CR)系统之间作物氮吸收的差异。采用15N富铵硫酸铵作为预施(150 kg N ha - 1)或追施(30 kg N ha - 1),定量测定了作物对土壤N (N吸收土)和肥料N (N吸收肥)的吸收量。两季施氮前,FR处理的籽粒产量均高于CR处理,2021年产量差异为2.3 Mg ha−1 (p <;0.05), 2022年为1.7 Mg ha−1 (p <;0.05)。在考察作物氮素吸收来源时,在成熟阶段,FR处理的氮素吸收量平均比CR处理高16.7 kg N ha - 1 (p <;0.05)。不同处理间氮素吸收量基本一致。此外,CR和FR预施氮肥的土壤和作物氮肥回收率相当,表明两种系统中氮肥损失的途径和幅度相似。这些结果表明,氮素吸收土壤是CR降低氮素吸收量的主要原因。施用氮素作为追肥时也发现了类似的结果,FR在两个年份都增加了氮素吸收土壤。我们进一步研究了CR土壤氮吸收率较低的原因。土壤酚类物质在连续淹水的水稻系统中积累并稳定土壤氮,我们在田间研究中对其进行了量化。作为严格的实地研究的补充,一项包含9个成对的实地的区域调查研究进行了量化区域苯酚水平。在田间和区域调查研究中,CR区土壤酚含量高于FR区。综上所述,CR中较高的苯酚水平和较低的氮素吸收土壤提供了机制证据,表明在连续水稻系统中引入一季的休耕可以通过减少有机基质的抗性来提高土壤氮素有效性。未来的工作应该确定水稻连作条件下土壤苯酚积累对土壤氮循环的影响所需的时间,以及土壤微生物种群在这些土壤氮循环模式中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信