Brain Age as a New Measure of Disease Stratification in Huntington's Disease
IF 7.4
1区 医学
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pubu M. Abeyasinghe, James H. Cole, Adeel Razi, Govinda R. Poudel, Jane S. Paulsen, Sarah J. Tabrizi, Jeffrey D. Long, Nellie Georgiou‐Karistianis
求助PDF
{"title":"Brain Age as a New Measure of Disease Stratification in Huntington's Disease","authors":"Pubu M. Abeyasinghe, James H. Cole, Adeel Razi, Govinda R. Poudel, Jane S. Paulsen, Sarah J. Tabrizi, Jeffrey D. Long, Nellie Georgiou‐Karistianis","doi":"10.1002/mds.30109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDespite advancements in understanding Huntington's disease (HD) over the past two decades, absence of disease‐modifying treatments remains a challenge. Accurately characterizing progression states is crucial for developing effective therapeutic interventions. Various factors contribute to this challenge, including the need for precise methods that can account for the complex nature of HD progression.ObjectiveThis study aims to address this gap by leveraging the concept of the brain's biological age as a foundation for a data‐driven clustering method to delineate various states of progression. Brain‐predicted age, influenced by somatic expansion and its impact on brain volumes, offers a promising avenue for stratification by stratifying subgroups and determining the optimal timing for interventions.MethodsTo achieve this, data from 953 participants across diverse cohorts, including PREDICT‐HD, TRACK‐HD, and IMAGE‐HD, were meticulously analyzed. Brain‐predicted age was computed using sophisticated algorithms, and participants were categorized into four groups based on CAG and age product score. Unsupervised k‐means clustering with brain‐predicted age difference (brain‐PAD) was then employed to identify distinct progression states.ResultsThe analysis revealed significant disparities in brain‐predicted age between HD participants and controls, with these differences becoming more pronounced as the disease progressed. Brain‐PAD demonstrated a correlation with disease severity, effectively identifying five distinct progression states characterized by significant longitudinal disparities.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of brain‐PAD in capturing HD progression states, thereby enhancing prognostic methodologies and providing valuable insights for future clinical trial designs and interventions. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
BackgroundDespite advancements in understanding Huntington's disease (HD) over the past two decades, absence of disease‐modifying treatments remains a challenge. Accurately characterizing progression states is crucial for developing effective therapeutic interventions. Various factors contribute to this challenge, including the need for precise methods that can account for the complex nature of HD progression.ObjectiveThis study aims to address this gap by leveraging the concept of the brain's biological age as a foundation for a data‐driven clustering method to delineate various states of progression. Brain‐predicted age, influenced by somatic expansion and its impact on brain volumes, offers a promising avenue for stratification by stratifying subgroups and determining the optimal timing for interventions.MethodsTo achieve this, data from 953 participants across diverse cohorts, including PREDICT‐HD, TRACK‐HD, and IMAGE‐HD, were meticulously analyzed. Brain‐predicted age was computed using sophisticated algorithms, and participants were categorized into four groups based on CAG and age product score. Unsupervised k‐means clustering with brain‐predicted age difference (brain‐PAD) was then employed to identify distinct progression states.ResultsThe analysis revealed significant disparities in brain‐predicted age between HD participants and controls, with these differences becoming more pronounced as the disease progressed. Brain‐PAD demonstrated a correlation with disease severity, effectively identifying five distinct progression states characterized by significant longitudinal disparities.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of brain‐PAD in capturing HD progression states, thereby enhancing prognostic methodologies and providing valuable insights for future clinical trial designs and interventions. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.