A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA-Methylation-Based Age-Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Martina Onofri, Federica Alessandrini, Serena Aneli, Loredana Buscemi, Elena Chierto, Matteo Fabbri, Paolo Fattorini, Paolo Garofano, Fabiano Gentile, Silvano Presciuttini, Carlo Previderè, Carlo Robino, Simona Severini, Federica Tommolini, Pamela Tozzo, Andrea Verzeletti, Eugenia Carnevali
{"title":"A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA-Methylation-Based Age-Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework","authors":"Martina Onofri,&nbsp;Federica Alessandrini,&nbsp;Serena Aneli,&nbsp;Loredana Buscemi,&nbsp;Elena Chierto,&nbsp;Matteo Fabbri,&nbsp;Paolo Fattorini,&nbsp;Paolo Garofano,&nbsp;Fabiano Gentile,&nbsp;Silvano Presciuttini,&nbsp;Carlo Previderè,&nbsp;Carlo Robino,&nbsp;Simona Severini,&nbsp;Federica Tommolini,&nbsp;Pamela Tozzo,&nbsp;Andrea Verzeletti,&nbsp;Eugenia Carnevali","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing interest in DNA methylation (DNAm) analysis within the forensic scientific community prompted a collaborative project by Ge.F.I. (Genetisti Forensi Italiani). The study evaluated a standardized bisulfite conversion–based Single Base Extension (SBE) protocol for the analysis of the methylation levels at five age-predictive loci (ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59). The study encompassed three phases: (1) setting up and validating the protocol to ensure consistency and reproducibility; (2) comparing fresh peripheral blood with blood spots; and (3) evaluating sources of intra- and inter-laboratory variability. Samples from 22 Italian volunteers were analyzed by 6 laboratories in replicates for a total of 528 records. From phase I emerged that the choice of genetic sequencer significantly contributed to inter-laboratory data variation, resulting in separate regression analyses performed for each laboratory. In phase II, blood spots were found to be a reliable source for DNAm analysis, despite exhibiting increased experimental variation compared to fresh peripheral blood. In phase III, a strong correlation between the individual's predicted and true ages was observed across different laboratories. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the residuals indicated that one-third of the total variance could be attributed to laboratory-specific factors, whereas two-thirds could be attributed to inter-individual biological differences. The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) method yielded an overall mean absolute deviation (MAD) value of 4.41 years, with an average 95% confidence interval of 5.24 years. Stepwise regression analysis proved that a restricted model (ELOVL2, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59) produced results virtually indistinguishable from the five-loci model. Additionally, the analysis of samples in replicates greatly improved the fit of the regression model, balancing the slight effects of intra-laboratory variability. In conclusion, the bisulfite conversion–based SBE protocol, combined with replicate analysis and in-lab calibration of a regression-prediction model, proves to be a reliable and easily implementable method for age prediction in forensic laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"46 1-2","pages":"76-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.202400190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing interest in DNA methylation (DNAm) analysis within the forensic scientific community prompted a collaborative project by Ge.F.I. (Genetisti Forensi Italiani). The study evaluated a standardized bisulfite conversion–based Single Base Extension (SBE) protocol for the analysis of the methylation levels at five age-predictive loci (ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59). The study encompassed three phases: (1) setting up and validating the protocol to ensure consistency and reproducibility; (2) comparing fresh peripheral blood with blood spots; and (3) evaluating sources of intra- and inter-laboratory variability. Samples from 22 Italian volunteers were analyzed by 6 laboratories in replicates for a total of 528 records. From phase I emerged that the choice of genetic sequencer significantly contributed to inter-laboratory data variation, resulting in separate regression analyses performed for each laboratory. In phase II, blood spots were found to be a reliable source for DNAm analysis, despite exhibiting increased experimental variation compared to fresh peripheral blood. In phase III, a strong correlation between the individual's predicted and true ages was observed across different laboratories. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the residuals indicated that one-third of the total variance could be attributed to laboratory-specific factors, whereas two-thirds could be attributed to inter-individual biological differences. The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) method yielded an overall mean absolute deviation (MAD) value of 4.41 years, with an average 95% confidence interval of 5.24 years. Stepwise regression analysis proved that a restricted model (ELOVL2, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59) produced results virtually indistinguishable from the five-loci model. Additionally, the analysis of samples in replicates greatly improved the fit of the regression model, balancing the slight effects of intra-laboratory variability. In conclusion, the bisulfite conversion–based SBE protocol, combined with replicate analysis and in-lab calibration of a regression-prediction model, proves to be a reliable and easily implementable method for age prediction in forensic laboratories.

Abstract Image

Ge.F.I。合作研究:评估基于dna甲基化的年龄预测分析在法医案件中常规实施的可重复性和准确性。
法医科学界对DNA甲基化(DNAm)分析的兴趣日益浓厚,促使Ge.F.I.开展了一个合作项目。(意大利法医遗传学)。该研究评估了一种基于亚硫酸盐转化的标准化单碱基扩展(SBE)方案,用于分析五个年龄预测位点(ELOVL2、FHL2、KLF14、C1orf132/MIR29B2C和TRIM59)的甲基化水平。该研究包括三个阶段:(1)建立和验证方案,以确保一致性和可重复性;(2)外周血与血斑比较;(3)评估实验室内部和实验室间变异的来源。来自22名意大利志愿者的样本由6个实验室重复分析,共有528条记录。从第一阶段开始,基因测序仪的选择显著影响了实验室间的数据差异,导致每个实验室进行单独的回归分析。在II期,尽管与新鲜外周血相比,血斑表现出更大的实验变化,但仍被发现是DNAm分析的可靠来源。在第三阶段,不同的实验室观察到个体的预测年龄和真实年龄之间存在很强的相关性。残差的方差分析(ANOVA)表明,总方差的三分之一可归因于实验室特定因素,而三分之二可归因于个体间生物差异。留一交叉验证(LOO-CV)方法的总平均绝对偏差(MAD)值为4.41年,平均95%置信区间为5.24年。逐步回归分析证明,限制模型(ELOVL2、C1orf132/MIR29B2C和TRIM59)产生的结果与五位点模型几乎没有区别。此外,对重复样本的分析大大提高了回归模型的拟合,平衡了实验室内变异性的轻微影响。综上所述,基于亚硫酸盐转化的SBE方案,结合重复分析和回归预测模型的实验室校准,证明是法医实验室年龄预测的可靠且易于实施的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信