Blockchain in supply chains: an unfulfilled promise

Michael Lustenberger, Florian Spychiger
{"title":"Blockchain in supply chains: an unfulfilled promise","authors":"Michael Lustenberger, Florian Spychiger","doi":"10.1108/scm-03-2024-0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper investigates the influence of blockchain technology on trust and transparency within supply chain management. While existing research suggests blockchain has revolutionary potential, real-world evidence remains limited. This study aims to bridge this gap.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The research relies on transaction cost analysis and principal-agent theory to develop a conceptual model. The model proposes how blockchain fosters trust and transparency, ultimately leading to a market-based governance model within supply chains. Five different blockchain applications were analyzed in a multi-case study through document reviews and expert interviews to test the model’s assumptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study’s findings challenge initial assumptions. The complexity of blockchain networks and a reluctance to share information among participants hinder blockchain technology’s ability to increase trust and transparency. Consequently, the expected reduction in opportunism and uncertainties is not observed, and a market-based governance model fails to materialize. In practice, supply chain partners gravitate toward permissioned blockchains managed by established consortia. Acting as trusted third parties, these consortia assume control over network management, rendering blockchain essentially unnecessary.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper sheds light on the practical limitations of blockchain technology in revolutionizing supply chain management. While blockchain promises much, the findings suggest that established consortia currently play a more critical role in fostering trust and transparency within supply chains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":30468,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-03-2024-0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigates the influence of blockchain technology on trust and transparency within supply chain management. While existing research suggests blockchain has revolutionary potential, real-world evidence remains limited. This study aims to bridge this gap.

Design/methodology/approach

The research relies on transaction cost analysis and principal-agent theory to develop a conceptual model. The model proposes how blockchain fosters trust and transparency, ultimately leading to a market-based governance model within supply chains. Five different blockchain applications were analyzed in a multi-case study through document reviews and expert interviews to test the model’s assumptions.

Findings

The study’s findings challenge initial assumptions. The complexity of blockchain networks and a reluctance to share information among participants hinder blockchain technology’s ability to increase trust and transparency. Consequently, the expected reduction in opportunism and uncertainties is not observed, and a market-based governance model fails to materialize. In practice, supply chain partners gravitate toward permissioned blockchains managed by established consortia. Acting as trusted third parties, these consortia assume control over network management, rendering blockchain essentially unnecessary.

Originality/value

This paper sheds light on the practical limitations of blockchain technology in revolutionizing supply chain management. While blockchain promises much, the findings suggest that established consortia currently play a more critical role in fostering trust and transparency within supply chains.

在供应链中:一个未实现的承诺
目的研究区块链技术对供应链管理中信任和透明度的影响。虽然现有的研究表明区块链具有革命性的潜力,但现实世界的证据仍然有限。这项研究旨在弥合这一差距。设计/方法/途径本研究基于交易成本分析和委托代理理论建立概念模型。该模型提出区块链如何促进信任和透明度,最终在供应链中形成以市场为基础的治理模式。通过文献回顾和专家访谈,在多案例研究中分析了五种不同的区块链应用,以检验模型的假设。这项研究的发现挑战了最初的假设。区块链网络的复杂性和参与者之间不愿共享信息阻碍了区块链技术增加信任和透明度的能力。因此,预期的机会主义和不确定性的减少并没有被观察到,以市场为基础的治理模式也未能实现。在实践中,供应链合作伙伴倾向于由老牌财团管理的许可区块链。作为受信任的第三方,这些联盟承担了对网络管理的控制,使得区块链基本上是不必要的。原创性/价值本文揭示了区块链技术在革新供应链管理方面的实际局限性。虽然区块链承诺很多,但研究结果表明,现有的财团目前在促进供应链内的信任和透明度方面发挥着更关键的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信