ESG‐Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence From an Emerging Economy

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, Sreelekshmi Geetha, Salu Prasad, Aghila Sasidharan, Ambili Jayachandran
{"title":"ESG‐Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence From an Emerging Economy","authors":"Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, Sreelekshmi Geetha, Salu Prasad, Aghila Sasidharan, Ambili Jayachandran","doi":"10.1002/bse.4152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms worldwide are strengthening environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, indicating a bidirectional association between financial and non‐financial performance. Understanding the ambiguity around the predictors of the firm's ESG performance, we attempt to reappraise the ESG‐ firm performance (FP) linkage using the firms indexed in the NIFTY 100 ESG index spanning 2014 to 2023. Our findings highlight that market forces significantly influence firms' ESG performance; however, in emerging economies, the direct relationship between ESG and FP appears to be insignificant. Surprisingly, corporate governance positively moderates the ESG–FP linkage, strengthening this association. Among the four proxies for market forces, the Volatility Index (VIX) shows a significant impact, where higher market volatility is associated with improved ESG performance, and lower volatility corresponds to weaker ESG performance. Conversely, the World Uncertainty Index (WUI) exhibits a negative significance, suggesting that higher WUI adversely affects the ESG performance of firms in emerging economies, while lower WUI has a favourable effect. Green bonds have a positive and significant effect on overall ESG performance and on social and governance dimensions; however, their influence on environmental performance is not significant, raising concerns about potential greenwashing trends. Strikingly, our findings indicate that emerging economy firms do not consider systematic risk, suggesting that investors' risk perceptions remain unchanged regardless of whether firms over‐ or under‐invest in ESG initiatives. Our research calls for greater attention to policymakers by providing accurate reasonings for the ESG performance of emerging economy firms.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firms worldwide are strengthening environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, indicating a bidirectional association between financial and non‐financial performance. Understanding the ambiguity around the predictors of the firm's ESG performance, we attempt to reappraise the ESG‐ firm performance (FP) linkage using the firms indexed in the NIFTY 100 ESG index spanning 2014 to 2023. Our findings highlight that market forces significantly influence firms' ESG performance; however, in emerging economies, the direct relationship between ESG and FP appears to be insignificant. Surprisingly, corporate governance positively moderates the ESG–FP linkage, strengthening this association. Among the four proxies for market forces, the Volatility Index (VIX) shows a significant impact, where higher market volatility is associated with improved ESG performance, and lower volatility corresponds to weaker ESG performance. Conversely, the World Uncertainty Index (WUI) exhibits a negative significance, suggesting that higher WUI adversely affects the ESG performance of firms in emerging economies, while lower WUI has a favourable effect. Green bonds have a positive and significant effect on overall ESG performance and on social and governance dimensions; however, their influence on environmental performance is not significant, raising concerns about potential greenwashing trends. Strikingly, our findings indicate that emerging economy firms do not consider systematic risk, suggesting that investors' risk perceptions remain unchanged regardless of whether firms over‐ or under‐invest in ESG initiatives. Our research calls for greater attention to policymakers by providing accurate reasonings for the ESG performance of emerging economy firms.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信