Ear acupuncture with laser and needles in the treatment of anxiety in university students: a randomized clinical trial.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0239en
Ana Paula da Silva Lemos, Bárbara Guimarães Lourenço, Érika de Cássia Lopes Chaves, Luana Vieira Toledo, Tânia Couto Machado Chianca, Caroline de Castro Moura
{"title":"Ear acupuncture with laser and needles in the treatment of anxiety in university students: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ana Paula da Silva Lemos, Bárbara Guimarães Lourenço, Érika de Cássia Lopes Chaves, Luana Vieira Toledo, Tânia Couto Machado Chianca, Caroline de Castro Moura","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0239en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of ear acupuncture with laser and needles in the treatment of anxiety in university students in the post-pandemic context of Covid-19, as well as to evaluate the possible symptoms or adverse reactions triggered by the interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Randomized clinical trial carried out with 126 university students, allocated to the \"Needle\" (control) and \"Laser\" (experimental) groups. Five ear acupuncture sessions were performed. Assessments were performed before, after the end of treatment and seven days later (follow up), through the State Anxiety Inventory and the measurement of heart and respiratory rates. The Generalized Estimating Equations were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a reduction in anxiety levels in both groups, between the initial and final assessments, and initial and follow up. There was no difference between the groups in the final and follow up. Heart rate decreased in the Needle group between the final and follow up, and initial and follow up assessments; the Laser group remained constant over time and the groups did not differ from each other between the end and follow up. There was no change over time in respiratory rate in either group and they did not differ from each other in the final and follow up assessments. There was a higher occurrence of adverse reactions in the group that received the intervention with needles, despite the mild intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interventions were effective in reducing anxiety levels in university students. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-8cxnvr2.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20240239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0239en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ear acupuncture with laser and needles in the treatment of anxiety in university students in the post-pandemic context of Covid-19, as well as to evaluate the possible symptoms or adverse reactions triggered by the interventions.

Method: Randomized clinical trial carried out with 126 university students, allocated to the "Needle" (control) and "Laser" (experimental) groups. Five ear acupuncture sessions were performed. Assessments were performed before, after the end of treatment and seven days later (follow up), through the State Anxiety Inventory and the measurement of heart and respiratory rates. The Generalized Estimating Equations were used.

Results: There was a reduction in anxiety levels in both groups, between the initial and final assessments, and initial and follow up. There was no difference between the groups in the final and follow up. Heart rate decreased in the Needle group between the final and follow up, and initial and follow up assessments; the Laser group remained constant over time and the groups did not differ from each other between the end and follow up. There was no change over time in respiratory rate in either group and they did not differ from each other in the final and follow up assessments. There was a higher occurrence of adverse reactions in the group that received the intervention with needles, despite the mild intensity.

Conclusion: Both interventions were effective in reducing anxiety levels in university students. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-8cxnvr2.

激光耳针联合耳针治疗大学生焦虑的随机临床试验
目的:比较激光耳针与针刺耳针治疗新冠肺炎大流行后大学生焦虑的效果,并评价干预措施可能引发的症状或不良反应。方法:对126名大学生进行随机临床试验,分为“针”组(对照组)和“激光”组(实验组)。进行五次耳针治疗。在治疗前、治疗结束后和7天后(随访),通过状态焦虑量表和测量心率和呼吸频率进行评估。采用广义估计方程。结果:在最初和最终评估之间,以及最初和随访之间,两组患者的焦虑水平均有所降低。在决赛和随访中,两组之间没有差异。针管组在最终评估和随访期间以及最初评估和随访期间心率下降;激光组在一段时间内保持不变,并且在结束和随访期间各组之间没有差异。两组患者的呼吸频率都没有随时间变化,在最终和随访评估中也没有差异。在接受针头干预的组中,尽管强度较轻,但不良反应的发生率较高。结论:两种干预措施均能有效降低大学生的焦虑水平。巴西临床试验登记处RBR-8cxnvr2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信