Prevalence, aetiology and antimicrobial resistance profile of diabetic individuals suffering from community-acquired urinary tract infection.

Ankita Priyadarshini, Priyal Kalola, Hemantkumar Patadia, Janvi Shah, Ajit Gangawane
{"title":"Prevalence, aetiology and antimicrobial resistance profile of diabetic individuals suffering from community-acquired urinary tract infection.","authors":"Ankita Priyadarshini, Priyal Kalola, Hemantkumar Patadia, Janvi Shah, Ajit Gangawane","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> The rise in antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health, particularly among diabetic patients who are prone to urinary tract infections (UTIs).<b>Hypothesis.</b> Pathogens that cause UTI among diabetic patients exhibit significant multidrug resistance (MDR) patterns, necessitating more precise empirical treatment strategies.<b>Aim</b>. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of UTI among diabetic patients and study the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of uropathogens, detected and identified the potential differences in age groups and between genders, focusing on MDR and gender-based variations, causing a global concern in deciding empirical treatment.<b>Methodology.</b> A prospective study was conducted from August 2021 to December 2023 in Gujarat, India. During the period, 1023 diabetic patients with symptoms of UTI were diagnosed by urine culture and 280 individuals tested positive for UTIs. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out on these 280 micro-organism isolates.<b>Results.</b> Among the 280 UTI-positive patients, 166 (59.29%) were females and 114 (40.71%) were males, with the prevalence of UTI in diabetic females being 27.34% (166/607) and males being 27.40% (114/416). Among the isolated uropathogens, <i>Escherichia coli</i> (56.78%) was the predominant organism followed by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (13.57%) and <i>Klebsiella</i> (13.21%). High resistance was noted to various antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria including both genders. In <i>E. coli</i>, resistance was predominantly high against the penicillin sub-class of the beta-lactam group (70.23%, 69.58%), cephalosporins (66.23%, 76.52%) and least against nitrofurans (30.10%, 40%) in males and females, respectively. <i>Klebsiella</i> has shown higher resistance to cephalosporins (66.23%, 76.52%) and aminoglycosides (60.92%, 62.66%) and least resistance to carbapenem (41.67%) and phosphonic (33.33%) in males and females, respectively. A high proportion of isolates, ~82.5%, exhibited MDR. Among these MDR isolates, those from female patients accounted for a higher percentage (58.44%) compared with males (41.55%). The highest prevalence of MDR was observed in the 41-60-year age group. This pattern highlights notable differences in MDR prevalence across gender and age groups.<b>Conclusion.</b> The high prevalence of UTI caused by MDR organisms based on gender and age group highlights the need for clinicians to choose antibiotics more judiciously for empirical treatment, thereby reducing misuse and overuse in the community. For diabetic UTI patients in this region, nitrofurantoin may be recommended for uncomplicated cases due to low resistance in <i>E. coli</i>, while fosfomycin could be a viable alternative for <i>Klebsiella</i>-related infections. Carbapenems may be reserved for severe cases with MDR pathogens, and combination therapy could be considered for complicated infections, particularly in high-risk age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The rise in antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health, particularly among diabetic patients who are prone to urinary tract infections (UTIs).Hypothesis. Pathogens that cause UTI among diabetic patients exhibit significant multidrug resistance (MDR) patterns, necessitating more precise empirical treatment strategies.Aim. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of UTI among diabetic patients and study the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of uropathogens, detected and identified the potential differences in age groups and between genders, focusing on MDR and gender-based variations, causing a global concern in deciding empirical treatment.Methodology. A prospective study was conducted from August 2021 to December 2023 in Gujarat, India. During the period, 1023 diabetic patients with symptoms of UTI were diagnosed by urine culture and 280 individuals tested positive for UTIs. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out on these 280 micro-organism isolates.Results. Among the 280 UTI-positive patients, 166 (59.29%) were females and 114 (40.71%) were males, with the prevalence of UTI in diabetic females being 27.34% (166/607) and males being 27.40% (114/416). Among the isolated uropathogens, Escherichia coli (56.78%) was the predominant organism followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.57%) and Klebsiella (13.21%). High resistance was noted to various antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria including both genders. In E. coli, resistance was predominantly high against the penicillin sub-class of the beta-lactam group (70.23%, 69.58%), cephalosporins (66.23%, 76.52%) and least against nitrofurans (30.10%, 40%) in males and females, respectively. Klebsiella has shown higher resistance to cephalosporins (66.23%, 76.52%) and aminoglycosides (60.92%, 62.66%) and least resistance to carbapenem (41.67%) and phosphonic (33.33%) in males and females, respectively. A high proportion of isolates, ~82.5%, exhibited MDR. Among these MDR isolates, those from female patients accounted for a higher percentage (58.44%) compared with males (41.55%). The highest prevalence of MDR was observed in the 41-60-year age group. This pattern highlights notable differences in MDR prevalence across gender and age groups.Conclusion. The high prevalence of UTI caused by MDR organisms based on gender and age group highlights the need for clinicians to choose antibiotics more judiciously for empirical treatment, thereby reducing misuse and overuse in the community. For diabetic UTI patients in this region, nitrofurantoin may be recommended for uncomplicated cases due to low resistance in E. coli, while fosfomycin could be a viable alternative for Klebsiella-related infections. Carbapenems may be reserved for severe cases with MDR pathogens, and combination therapy could be considered for complicated infections, particularly in high-risk age groups.

糖尿病社区获得性尿路感染的患病率、病因学及耐药性分析
介绍。抗菌素耐药性的上升对全球健康构成重大威胁,特别是对易发生尿路感染(uti)的糖尿病患者。引起糖尿病患者尿路感染的病原体表现出明显的多药耐药性(MDR)模式,需要更精确的经验性治疗策略。本研究旨在确定尿路感染在糖尿病患者中的患病率,研究尿路病原体的抗菌药物敏感性特征,检测并确定年龄和性别之间的潜在差异,重点关注耐多药和性别差异,引起全球关注,以确定经验性治疗。一项前瞻性研究于2021年8月至2023年12月在印度古吉拉特邦进行。在此期间,通过尿培养诊断出1023例有尿路感染症状的糖尿病患者,280例尿路感染检测呈阳性。对这280株分离菌进行了药敏试验。280例尿路感染阳性患者中,女性166例(59.29%),男性114例(40.71%),其中女性糖尿病患者尿路感染患病率为27.34%(166/607),男性为27.40%(114/416)。尿路病原菌以大肠杆菌(56.78%)为主,其次为铜绿假单胞菌(13.57%)和克雷伯菌(13.21%)。革兰氏阴性菌对多种抗生素均有高耐药性,包括两性。大肠杆菌对β -内酰胺组中青霉素亚类的耐药率最高(70.23%,69.58%),对头孢菌素的耐药率最高(66.23%,76.52%),对硝基呋喃的耐药率最低(30.10%,40%)。克雷伯菌对头孢菌素(66.23%,76.52%)和氨基糖苷类(60.92%,62.66%)的耐药率最高,对碳青霉烯类(41.67%)和膦类(33.33%)的耐药率最低。较高比例的分离株(约82.5%)表现出耐多药。在这些MDR分离株中,来自女性患者的比例(58.44%)高于男性(41.55%)。在41-60岁年龄组中,耐多药发生率最高。这一模式突出了耐多药患病率在性别和年龄组之间的显著差异。基于性别和年龄组的耐多药微生物引起的尿路感染的高流行率突出了临床医生需要更明智地选择抗生素进行经验性治疗,从而减少社区中的滥用和过度使用。对于该地区的糖尿病尿路感染患者,由于大肠杆菌耐药性低,可能推荐对无并发症的病例使用呋喃妥因,而磷霉素可能是克雷伯菌相关感染的可行替代方案。碳青霉烯类药物可用于耐多药病原体的严重病例,可考虑联合治疗复杂感染,特别是高危年龄组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信