Correlation between maxillary defect and facial asymmetry.

Y Huang, W Wang, B X Gu, Z Y Wu, X H Zhou, Z G Cai, J Zhang
{"title":"Correlation between maxillary defect and facial asymmetry.","authors":"Y Huang, W Wang, B X Gu, Z Y Wu, X H Zhou, Z G Cai, J Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between maxillary defects and facial asymmetry, and to establish categories for visual perception of facial asymmetry. The facial data of 47 patients who underwent maxillary resection due to tumors were captured using stereophotogrammetry. Facial asymmetry was measured using a landmark-independent method and assessed with a Likert scale. Facial asymmetry was classified into three grades (I-III) based on visual perception. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in the asymmetry of the suborbital, zygomatic, buccal, and superolabial areas among the different visual perception categories, and the symmetry of these areas significantly influenced the visual perception (P < 0.001). The maxillary defect magnitude significantly influenced facial asymmetry perception (P < 0.001). Substantial statistical variations (P < 0.001) in the asymmetry of four facial areas, excluding the masseteric and nasal areas, across the different classes of maxillary defect were noted. Maxillary defects significantly affect the midface soft tissue symmetry. Reconstruction should focus on sufficient soft tissue support in the zygomatic, buccal, suborbital, and superolabial areas. Corrective measures are generally unnecessary for grade I asymmetry. For grade II asymmetry, reconstruction can be decided individually. For grade III asymmetry, reconstruction is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between maxillary defects and facial asymmetry, and to establish categories for visual perception of facial asymmetry. The facial data of 47 patients who underwent maxillary resection due to tumors were captured using stereophotogrammetry. Facial asymmetry was measured using a landmark-independent method and assessed with a Likert scale. Facial asymmetry was classified into three grades (I-III) based on visual perception. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in the asymmetry of the suborbital, zygomatic, buccal, and superolabial areas among the different visual perception categories, and the symmetry of these areas significantly influenced the visual perception (P < 0.001). The maxillary defect magnitude significantly influenced facial asymmetry perception (P < 0.001). Substantial statistical variations (P < 0.001) in the asymmetry of four facial areas, excluding the masseteric and nasal areas, across the different classes of maxillary defect were noted. Maxillary defects significantly affect the midface soft tissue symmetry. Reconstruction should focus on sufficient soft tissue support in the zygomatic, buccal, suborbital, and superolabial areas. Corrective measures are generally unnecessary for grade I asymmetry. For grade II asymmetry, reconstruction can be decided individually. For grade III asymmetry, reconstruction is essential.

上颌缺损与面部不对称的关系。
本研究的目的是评估上颌缺损与面部不对称的相关性,并建立面部不对称的视觉知觉分类。采用立体摄影测量法对47例上颌肿瘤切除术患者的面部数据进行了采集。面部不对称采用地标无关法测量,李克特量表评估。根据视觉感知将面部不对称分为3个等级(I-III)。眼眶亚区、颧骨区、颊区和唇上区在不同视知觉类别间的不对称性差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),且这些区域的对称性显著影响视知觉(P < 0.001)。上颌缺损程度显著影响面部不对称知觉(P < 0.001)。在不同类型的上颌缺损中,四个面部区域(不包括咬肌区和鼻区)的不对称性有显著的统计学差异(P < 0.001)。上颌缺损对中脸软组织对称性有显著影响。重建应着重于颧骨、颊、眶下和唇上区域有足够的软组织支持。对于I级不对称,一般不需要采取纠正措施。对于II级不对称,可以单独决定重建。对于III级不对称,重建是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信