Effectiveness of text message reminder and motivational interview on adherence to methadone treatment in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial.

Uyen Thanh Nu Le, Thuan Thien Tran, Giang Truong Le, Ha Khanh Mai Huynh, Han Hy Thi Bui, Phuong Thu Thi Pham, Mai Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Truc Thanh Thai
{"title":"Effectiveness of text message reminder and motivational interview on adherence to methadone treatment in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Uyen Thanh Nu Le, Thuan Thien Tran, Giang Truong Le, Ha Khanh Mai Huynh, Han Hy Thi Bui, Phuong Thu Thi Pham, Mai Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Truc Thanh Thai","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is effective for treating opioid dependence. However, nonadherence can increase the risk of withdrawal syndrome, relapse, and overdose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based randomized controlled trial was conducted on 450 opioid-dependent patients undergoing MMT at three clinics in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups including control, text message reminder (TMR), and motivational interview (MI). Treatment adherence was assessed every 3 months, including complete adherence, consecutive adherence, and weekend adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months, the MI group had significantly higher complete adherence than the control group (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.09-1.69). The TMR group showed higher complete adherence at 3 months (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.58) and 6 months (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56) compared to the control group. Weekend adherence in the TMR group was higher than the control group after 6 months (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MI and TMR effectively improved treatment adherence, particularly complete adherence. Therefore, this study suggests the potential of these two methods in enhancing adherence among MMT patients in Vietnam.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is effective for treating opioid dependence. However, nonadherence can increase the risk of withdrawal syndrome, relapse, and overdose.

Methods: A community-based randomized controlled trial was conducted on 450 opioid-dependent patients undergoing MMT at three clinics in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups including control, text message reminder (TMR), and motivational interview (MI). Treatment adherence was assessed every 3 months, including complete adherence, consecutive adherence, and weekend adherence.

Results: After 6 months, the MI group had significantly higher complete adherence than the control group (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.09-1.69). The TMR group showed higher complete adherence at 3 months (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.58) and 6 months (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56) compared to the control group. Weekend adherence in the TMR group was higher than the control group after 6 months (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.31).

Conclusion: MI and TMR effectively improved treatment adherence, particularly complete adherence. Therefore, this study suggests the potential of these two methods in enhancing adherence among MMT patients in Vietnam.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信