Evidence-based exercise recommendations to improve functional mobility in older adults - A study protocol for living systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bettina Wollesen, Tamar Yellon, Antoine Langeard, Vera Belkin, Anna Wunderlich, Eleftheria Giannouli, Guoping Qian, Rafael A Bernades, Zbigniew Ossowski, Uros Marusic, Rajesh Sighdel, Yael Netz, Claudia Volecker-Rehage
{"title":"Evidence-based exercise recommendations to improve functional mobility in older adults - A study protocol for living systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bettina Wollesen, Tamar Yellon, Antoine Langeard, Vera Belkin, Anna Wunderlich, Eleftheria Giannouli, Guoping Qian, Rafael A Bernades, Zbigniew Ossowski, Uros Marusic, Rajesh Sighdel, Yael Netz, Claudia Volecker-Rehage","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.17823.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis.This review will assess the effects of state-of-the-art exercise interventions designed to promote functional mobility. Therefore, after identifying all potential interventions, we will use the F.I.T.T. principles (frequency, intensity, time, type) as well as the physical and health status of the participants as moderators to analyse the mechanisms for the positive benefits of exercise interventions.The main research questions are:Which exercise types are most beneficial for improving functional mobility in various populations of older adults?Which physical exercise characteristics in terms of frequency, intensity, time and duration will achieve the greatest benefit in terms of the defined outcomes, i.e, the functional mobility of older adults?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic literature research according to PRISMA guidelines will search databases like MEDLINE, APA Psych-Info and Web of Science.Inclusion criteria are: healthy older people ≥ 50 years, randomized-controlled trials including exercise intervention and a walking or mobility assessments (eg., TUG, SPPB) as an outcome measure. A preliminary search revealed more than 33,000 hits that will be screened by pairs of independent reviewers. The results will be summarized according to the effects regarding functional mobility and potential dose-response relations via respective meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic review will comprise the knowledge of the existing literature with regards to the effects of the physical activity interventions compared to an active or inactive control group.We will summarize the effects with respect to the F.I.T.T.. They provide a foundation for structuring an optimal exercise training program. If possible, we will also compare interventions from the different categories (eg. cardiovascular, resistance, motor-coordinative, multicomponent or mind-body exercise) as a network analysis and report the influence of moderator variables. Based on the results evidence-based guidelines following GRADE for physical exercise interventions to improve functional mobility in older adults will be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17823.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: This is a protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis.This review will assess the effects of state-of-the-art exercise interventions designed to promote functional mobility. Therefore, after identifying all potential interventions, we will use the F.I.T.T. principles (frequency, intensity, time, type) as well as the physical and health status of the participants as moderators to analyse the mechanisms for the positive benefits of exercise interventions.The main research questions are:Which exercise types are most beneficial for improving functional mobility in various populations of older adults?Which physical exercise characteristics in terms of frequency, intensity, time and duration will achieve the greatest benefit in terms of the defined outcomes, i.e, the functional mobility of older adults?
Methods: The systematic literature research according to PRISMA guidelines will search databases like MEDLINE, APA Psych-Info and Web of Science.Inclusion criteria are: healthy older people ≥ 50 years, randomized-controlled trials including exercise intervention and a walking or mobility assessments (eg., TUG, SPPB) as an outcome measure. A preliminary search revealed more than 33,000 hits that will be screened by pairs of independent reviewers. The results will be summarized according to the effects regarding functional mobility and potential dose-response relations via respective meta-analysis.
Conclusion: The systematic review will comprise the knowledge of the existing literature with regards to the effects of the physical activity interventions compared to an active or inactive control group.We will summarize the effects with respect to the F.I.T.T.. They provide a foundation for structuring an optimal exercise training program. If possible, we will also compare interventions from the different categories (eg. cardiovascular, resistance, motor-coordinative, multicomponent or mind-body exercise) as a network analysis and report the influence of moderator variables. Based on the results evidence-based guidelines following GRADE for physical exercise interventions to improve functional mobility in older adults will be provided.
背景和目的:这是一个活体系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。本综述将评估旨在促进功能活动能力的最先进运动干预措施的效果。因此,在确定所有潜在的干预措施后,我们将使用F.I.T.T.原则(频率、强度、时间、类型)以及参与者的身体和健康状况作为调节因子来分析运动干预的积极效益机制。主要的研究问题是:在不同的老年人群体中,哪种运动类型对改善功能活动能力最有益?在频率、强度、时间和持续时间方面,哪种体育锻炼特征在定义的结果(即老年人的功能活动能力)方面会产生最大的益处?方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统文献研究,检索MEDLINE、APA Psych-Info、Web of Science等数据库。纳入标准为:≥50岁的健康老年人,随机对照试验,包括运动干预和步行或活动能力评估(例如;(TUG, SPPB)作为结果测量。初步搜索结果显示,超过3.3万个点击将由两对独立评论者进行筛选。结果将根据功能迁移率和潜在剂量-反应关系的影响,通过各自的荟萃分析进行总结。结论:系统综述将包括现有文献的知识,关于体育活动干预与积极或不积极对照组的影响。我们将总结其对国际足联的影响。它们为构建最佳运动训练计划提供了基础。如果可能的话,我们还将比较不同类别的干预措施(例如:心血管、阻力、运动协调、多组分或心身运动)作为网络分析并报告调节变量的影响。基于结果,将提供基于GRADE的体育锻炼干预改善老年人功能活动能力的循证指南。