The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly","doi":"10.1071/AH24182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCOVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost.ResultsIn T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED.ConclusionsDuring initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveCOVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost.ResultsIn T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED.ConclusionsDuring initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信