The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on public and private emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Amy L Sweeny, Emma Hall, Anthony Padowitz, Ben Walters, Ping Zhang, Kylie Alcorn, Gerben Keijzers, Andrea P Marshall, Jamie Ranse, Julia Crilly","doi":"10.1071/AH24182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective COVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost. Results In T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED. Conclusions During initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective COVID-19 affected health care globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on both public and private emergency departments (EDs). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of ED presentations made to three private and two public hospital EDs located in one region in Queensland. Presentation rates per 1000 population and incident rate ratios (IRR) for three time periods: T1: pre-pandemic (March-June 2018/2019), T2: initial restrictions (March-June 2020), and T3: restrictions easing (March-June 2021) were calculated. Linear trends were produced to describe pre- and post-pandemic changes. Additional outcomes reported for public EDs included ED length of stay (LoS) and cost. Results In T2, both public and private ED presentation rates decreased by 12% (overall IRR 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.89). Private EDs experienced a quicker and greater return of patient volumes in T3, exceeding T1 levels. The median ED length of stay decreased and then increased above pre-pandemic levels (T1: 159 min, T2: 151 min, T3: 201 min). Total costs were higher during T2 but then decreased during T3, below that of T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566). Between February 2020 and June 2021, 269 people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 19 of whom (7.1%) interfaced with the ED. Conclusions During initial COVID-19 restrictions, a shift towards fewer ED presentations was observed. Private ED presentations rebounded more quickly than public. Few COVID-19 patients interfaced with an ED. Systems and public-private agreements made during this time appeared to protect EDs and soften the impact of reduced volumes for the private sector.

COVID-19对澳大利亚昆士兰州公共和私人急诊部门的影响。
目的2019冠状病毒病疫情对全球卫生保健造成影响。本研究的目的是调查COVID-19对公立和私立急诊室(EDs)的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对昆士兰州一个地区的三家私立医院和两家公立医院急诊科的急诊科报告进行了分析。计算了三个时间段的每1000人的发病率和发病率比:T1:大流行前(2018/2019年3月至6月)、T2:初始限制(2020年3月至6月)和T3:放宽限制(2021年3月至6月)。产生了线性趋势来描述大流行前后的变化。公共急诊科报告的其他结果包括急诊科住院时间(LoS)和费用。结果在T2期,公共和私人ED的呈现率下降了12%(总IRR 0.88;95%置信区间(CI): 0.87-0.89)。私立急诊科T3的病人数量恢复得更快、更大,超过了T1的水平。急诊停留时间中位数先减少后增加,高于大流行前水平(T1: 159分钟,T2: 151分钟,T3: 201分钟)。总成本在T2期间较高,但在T3期间下降,低于T1 (T1: A$652, T2: A$791, T3: A$566)。在2020年2月至2021年6月期间,269人的SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性,其中19人(7.1%)与ED有接触。结论在最初的COVID-19限制期间,观察到ED出现减少的趋势。私人教育报告比公共教育报告反弹得更快。很少有COVID-19患者与急诊科接触。在此期间制定的制度和公私协议似乎保护了急诊科,并减轻了业务量减少对私营部门的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信