Relationship between fluid intake, hydration status and cortisol dynamics in healthy, young adult males

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mitchell E. Zaplatosch , Laurie Wideman , Jessica McNeil , Jesse N.L. Sims , William M. Adams
{"title":"Relationship between fluid intake, hydration status and cortisol dynamics in healthy, young adult males","authors":"Mitchell E. Zaplatosch ,&nbsp;Laurie Wideman ,&nbsp;Jessica McNeil ,&nbsp;Jesse N.L. Sims ,&nbsp;William M. Adams","doi":"10.1016/j.cpnec.2024.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous studies have identified links between fluid intake, hydration related hormones and cortisol measured at one timepoint but have not considered how hydration may influence cortisol dynamics throughout the day. This study assessed associations between hydration status (copeptin, urinary osmolality, urine volume) and habitual fluid intake with cortisol dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The day before (DB) a 6-h laboratory visit, 29 male participants (age, 23±4y; BMI, 25.5 ± 4.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; body fat, 17.3 ± 9.3 %) provided 24-h urine samples and a fasted blood sample for hydration status assessment, recorded their 24-h fluid intake for three days prior, and provided 10 saliva samples to assess cortisol dynamics from DB into the evening of the laboratory visit. Calculated indices of cortisol dynamics included: nocturnal cortisol rise (NCR – salivary cortisol rise from bed to awakening), peak salivary cortisol (peak S<sub>CORT</sub> – highest cortisol of all samples), cortisol awakening response (ΔCAR – difference between high morning sample and awakening sample), area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCG) and increase (AUCI), and diurnal cortisol slope (DCS – rate of change in cortisol from awakening to bed). The relationships between fluid intake or hydration status and cortisol dynamics were analyzed by separating participants into fluid intake tertile groups and by regressing cortisol dynamics on the continuous variables of total fluid intake (TFI) or hydration biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no between-group differences for ΔCAR (p = 0.89), AUCG (p = 0.57), AUCI (p = 0.48), peak S<sub>CORT</sub> (p = 0.14), NCR (p = 0.95), DCS (p = 0.22), or serum cortisol (p = 0.61). TFI was not associated with log (peak S<sub>CORT</sub>) (p = 0.49), ΔCAR (p = 0.61), AUCG (p = 0.76), or AUCI (p = 0.56). Copeptin was not associated with log (peak S<sub>CORT</sub>) (p = 0.99), ΔCAR (p = 0.22), AUCG (p = 0.69) or AUCI (p = 0.18). Urinary hydration markers were not associated with any measures of cortisol dynamics (p &gt; 0.05). These null effects were consistent when controlling for physical activity, sleep, and body fat percentage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the absence of dehydrating stimuli, measures of fluid intake or hydration status may not be associated with cortisol dynamics in young healthy males.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72656,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497624000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have identified links between fluid intake, hydration related hormones and cortisol measured at one timepoint but have not considered how hydration may influence cortisol dynamics throughout the day. This study assessed associations between hydration status (copeptin, urinary osmolality, urine volume) and habitual fluid intake with cortisol dynamics.

Methods

The day before (DB) a 6-h laboratory visit, 29 male participants (age, 23±4y; BMI, 25.5 ± 4.3 kg/m2; body fat, 17.3 ± 9.3 %) provided 24-h urine samples and a fasted blood sample for hydration status assessment, recorded their 24-h fluid intake for three days prior, and provided 10 saliva samples to assess cortisol dynamics from DB into the evening of the laboratory visit. Calculated indices of cortisol dynamics included: nocturnal cortisol rise (NCR – salivary cortisol rise from bed to awakening), peak salivary cortisol (peak SCORT – highest cortisol of all samples), cortisol awakening response (ΔCAR – difference between high morning sample and awakening sample), area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCG) and increase (AUCI), and diurnal cortisol slope (DCS – rate of change in cortisol from awakening to bed). The relationships between fluid intake or hydration status and cortisol dynamics were analyzed by separating participants into fluid intake tertile groups and by regressing cortisol dynamics on the continuous variables of total fluid intake (TFI) or hydration biomarkers.

Results

There were no between-group differences for ΔCAR (p = 0.89), AUCG (p = 0.57), AUCI (p = 0.48), peak SCORT (p = 0.14), NCR (p = 0.95), DCS (p = 0.22), or serum cortisol (p = 0.61). TFI was not associated with log (peak SCORT) (p = 0.49), ΔCAR (p = 0.61), AUCG (p = 0.76), or AUCI (p = 0.56). Copeptin was not associated with log (peak SCORT) (p = 0.99), ΔCAR (p = 0.22), AUCG (p = 0.69) or AUCI (p = 0.18). Urinary hydration markers were not associated with any measures of cortisol dynamics (p > 0.05). These null effects were consistent when controlling for physical activity, sleep, and body fat percentage.

Conclusion

In the absence of dehydrating stimuli, measures of fluid intake or hydration status may not be associated with cortisol dynamics in young healthy males.

Abstract Image

健康年轻成年男性液体摄入量、水合状态和皮质醇动态的关系
背景:以前的研究已经确定了在一个时间点测量的液体摄入量、水合作用相关激素和皮质醇之间的联系,但没有考虑水合作用如何影响全天的皮质醇动态。本研究评估了水合状态(copeptin、尿渗透压、尿量)和习惯性液体摄入量与皮质醇动力学之间的关系。方法:前一天(DB) 6小时实验室访问,29名男性参与者(年龄,23±4y;BMI: 25.5±4.3 kg/m2;体脂(17.3±9.3%)提供24小时尿液样本和空腹血液样本用于水化状态评估,记录他们三天前24小时的液体摄入量,并提供10份唾液样本用于评估从DB到实验室访问晚上的皮质醇动态。皮质醇动态的计算指标包括:夜间皮质醇升高(NCR -从床上到床上的唾液皮质醇升高),唾液皮质醇峰值(SCORT峰值-所有样本中最高的皮质醇),皮质醇觉醒反应(ΔCAR -高早晨样本和觉醒样本之间的差异),相对于地面的曲线下面积(AUCG)和增加(AUCI),以及皮质醇斜率(DCS -皮质醇从醒来到床上的变化率)。通过将参与者分为液体摄入量各组,并通过总液体摄入量(TFI)或水合作用生物标志物的连续变量回归皮质醇动力学,分析了液体摄入量或水合作用状态与皮质醇动力学之间的关系。结果:ΔCAR (p = 0.89)、AUCG (p = 0.57)、AUCI (p = 0.48)、峰值SCORT (p = 0.14)、NCR (p = 0.95)、DCS (p = 0.22)、血清皮质醇(p = 0.61)组间差异均无统计学意义。TFI与log(峰值scot) (p = 0.49)、ΔCAR (p = 0.61)、AUCG (p = 0.76)或AUCI (p = 0.56)无关。Copeptin与log(峰值SCORT) (p = 0.99)、ΔCAR (p = 0.22)、AUCG (p = 0.69)或AUCI (p = 0.18)均无相关性。尿水化指标与皮质醇动态变化无相关性(p < 0.05)。在控制体力活动、睡眠和体脂百分比时,这些无效效应是一致的。结论:在缺乏脱水刺激的情况下,年轻健康男性的液体摄入量或水合状态可能与皮质醇动力学无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信