A Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Multiorgan Point-of-care Ultrasound between High-risk and Medium-to-low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Cases.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Weihua Wu, Zhenfei Yu, Kang Cheng, Manqiong Xie, Shunjin Fang, Jianfeng Zhu
{"title":"A Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Multiorgan Point-of-care Ultrasound between High-risk and Medium-to-low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Cases.","authors":"Weihua Wu, Zhenfei Yu, Kang Cheng, Manqiong Xie, Shunjin Fang, Jianfeng Zhu","doi":"10.2174/0115734056344839250120045737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of multiorgan (heart, lungs, blood vessels) point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in patients with high-risk and medium-to-low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data of 92 patients with suspected PE, admitted to Hangzhou TCM Hospital affiliated with Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from July 2021 to June 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. According to hemodynamic status, patients were divided into the high-risk (n=28) and the medium-to-low-risk groups (n=64). Using computed tomography (CT) and pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the gold standard, all patients underwent multiorgan PoCUS examination. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different methods for diagnosing PE, as well as the time difference between multiorgan PoCUS examination and CTPA, were compared. Differences in measurement values of relevant indicators in all groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the high-risk group of patients, CTPA identified 15 cases of PE. In contrast, the PoCUS examination confirmed PE diagnosis in 14 cases (true positive), while 10 cases were diagnosed as true negative, one case as false negative, and three cases as false positive. In the medium-to-low-risk group, CTPA identified 50 patients with PE, while multiorgan PoCUS confirmed PE diagnosis in 33 cases (true positive), and identified 9 true negative, 17 false negative, and 5 false positive PE cases. Kappa test of the consistency between the results of multiorgan PoCUS and CTPA showed that multiorgan PoCUS had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the high-risk group compared to the medium-tolow- risk group (p<0.05). Cohen's Kappa value of the high-risk group was 0.710, indicating moderate consistency between PoCUS and CTPA results, while Cohen's Kappa value of 0.231 for the medium and low-risk group indicated poor consistency. There was a significant difference in ultrasound parameters between the high-risk and the medium-to-low-risk group (p<0.05). The time required for multiorgan PoCUS in both groups was significantly shorter than that for the CTPA. There was no significant difference in the time required for PoCUS between the two groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiorgan PoCUS has been found to have higher sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosing patients with high-risk PE compared to those with medium-to-low-risk PE, and a shorter imaging time compared to CTPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056344839250120045737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of multiorgan (heart, lungs, blood vessels) point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in patients with high-risk and medium-to-low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

Methods: Clinical data of 92 patients with suspected PE, admitted to Hangzhou TCM Hospital affiliated with Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from July 2021 to June 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. According to hemodynamic status, patients were divided into the high-risk (n=28) and the medium-to-low-risk groups (n=64). Using computed tomography (CT) and pulmonary angiography (CTPA) as the gold standard, all patients underwent multiorgan PoCUS examination. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different methods for diagnosing PE, as well as the time difference between multiorgan PoCUS examination and CTPA, were compared. Differences in measurement values of relevant indicators in all groups were analyzed.

Results: In the high-risk group of patients, CTPA identified 15 cases of PE. In contrast, the PoCUS examination confirmed PE diagnosis in 14 cases (true positive), while 10 cases were diagnosed as true negative, one case as false negative, and three cases as false positive. In the medium-to-low-risk group, CTPA identified 50 patients with PE, while multiorgan PoCUS confirmed PE diagnosis in 33 cases (true positive), and identified 9 true negative, 17 false negative, and 5 false positive PE cases. Kappa test of the consistency between the results of multiorgan PoCUS and CTPA showed that multiorgan PoCUS had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the high-risk group compared to the medium-tolow- risk group (p<0.05). Cohen's Kappa value of the high-risk group was 0.710, indicating moderate consistency between PoCUS and CTPA results, while Cohen's Kappa value of 0.231 for the medium and low-risk group indicated poor consistency. There was a significant difference in ultrasound parameters between the high-risk and the medium-to-low-risk group (p<0.05). The time required for multiorgan PoCUS in both groups was significantly shorter than that for the CTPA. There was no significant difference in the time required for PoCUS between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Multiorgan PoCUS has been found to have higher sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosing patients with high-risk PE compared to those with medium-to-low-risk PE, and a shorter imaging time compared to CTPA.

多器官定点超声对高危和中低危肺栓塞诊断价值的比较。
目的:探讨多器官(心、肺、血管)点旁超声(PoCUS)对高危及中低危肺栓塞(PE)患者的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析浙江中医药大学附属杭州中医院2021年7月至2023年6月收治的92例疑似肺栓塞患者的临床资料。根据血流动力学状态将患者分为高危组(n=28)和中低危组(n=64)。所有患者均行多器官PoCUS检查,以CT和CTPA为金标准。比较不同PE诊断方法的敏感性、特异性和准确性,以及多器官PoCUS检查与CTPA检查的时间差。分析各组相关指标测量值的差异。结果:在高危组患者中,CTPA鉴定出15例PE。相比之下,PoCUS检查确诊PE 14例(真阳性),诊断为真阴性10例,假阴性1例,假阳性3例。中低危组CTPA检出PE患者50例,多器官PoCUS检出PE 33例(真阳性),检出PE真阴性9例,假阴性17例,假阳性5例。多脏器PoCUS与CTPA结果一致性Kappa检验显示,多脏器PoCUS在高危组的敏感性、阴性预测值、准确性均高于中低危组(p0.05)。结论:多器官PoCUS对高危PE的诊断敏感性和准确性均高于中低危PE,且成像时间较CTPA短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信