Comparative analysis of ambient, in-home, and personal exposures reveals associations between breathing zone pollutant levels and asthma exacerbations in high-risk children.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Camille M Moore, Jonathan Thornburg, Elizabeth A Secor, Katharine L Hamlington, Allison M Schiltz, Kristy L Freeman, Jamie L Everman, Tasha E Fingerlin, Andrew H Liu, Max A Seibold
{"title":"Comparative analysis of ambient, in-home, and personal exposures reveals associations between breathing zone pollutant levels and asthma exacerbations in high-risk children.","authors":"Camille M Moore, Jonathan Thornburg, Elizabeth A Secor, Katharine L Hamlington, Allison M Schiltz, Kristy L Freeman, Jamie L Everman, Tasha E Fingerlin, Andrew H Liu, Max A Seibold","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03114-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Air pollution is associated with poor asthma outcomes in children. However, most studies focus on ambient or indoor monitor pollution levels. Few studies evaluate breathing zone exposures, which may be more consequential for asthma outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured personal exposures to NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> constituents, including black carbon (BC), brown carbon (BrC), environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), endotoxins, and 𝛽-glucan, in a cohort of children with exacerbation-prone asthma for 72 h using wearable monitors. Personal exposures were compared to concentrations from in-home monitors in the child's bedroom and ambient EPA air quality monitoring using correlation analyses. Personal exposures were tested for association with lung function and compared between participants with and without well-controlled asthma and signs of exacerbation in the prior 60 days using censored regression with robust standard errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>81 children completed 219 monitoring sessions. Personal NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> exposures ranged from < 2 to 99.1 parts per billion (ppb), < 1.5 to 23.3 ppb, and < 1 to 141.9 𝜇g/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Personal endotoxin ranged from 0.04 to 101.3 EU/m<sup>3</sup>, 𝛽-glucan from 18.5 to 1,162 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, BC from < 0.3 to 46.9 𝜇g/m<sup>3</sup>, BrC from < 0.3 to 6.1 𝜇g/m<sup>3</sup>, and ETS from < 0.3 to 56.6 𝜇g/m<sup>3</sup>. Correlations between personal and ambient PM<sub>10</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations were poor, whereas personal PM<sub>10</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> correlated with in-home concentrations. In-home monitoring less frequently detected BrC (Personal:79% > lower limit of detection, Home:36.8%) and ETS (Personal:83.7%, Home:4.1%) than personal exposures, and detected BC in participants without personal exposure (Personal: 26.5%, Home: 96%). Personal exposures were not significantly associated with lung function or daily asthma control. Children requiring corticosteroid treatment for asthma exacerbation within 60 days of exposure monitoring had 1.98, 2.21 and 2.04 times higher personal exposures to BrC (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.43-2.37), ETS (p = 0.007; 95% CI: 1.25-3.91), and endotoxin (p = 0.012; 95% CI: 1.14-3.68), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although in-home monitoring was correlated with personal exposure to PM<sub>10</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>, in-home detection of ETS and BrC was not associated with personal exposures. Personal PM<sub>10</sub> exposures in general, as well as BrC, ETS, and endotoxin levels were associated with recent childhood asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03114-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Air pollution is associated with poor asthma outcomes in children. However, most studies focus on ambient or indoor monitor pollution levels. Few studies evaluate breathing zone exposures, which may be more consequential for asthma outcomes.

Methods: We measured personal exposures to NO2, O3, PM10 and PM10 constituents, including black carbon (BC), brown carbon (BrC), environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), endotoxins, and 𝛽-glucan, in a cohort of children with exacerbation-prone asthma for 72 h using wearable monitors. Personal exposures were compared to concentrations from in-home monitors in the child's bedroom and ambient EPA air quality monitoring using correlation analyses. Personal exposures were tested for association with lung function and compared between participants with and without well-controlled asthma and signs of exacerbation in the prior 60 days using censored regression with robust standard errors.

Results: 81 children completed 219 monitoring sessions. Personal NO2, O3, and PM10 exposures ranged from < 2 to 99.1 parts per billion (ppb), < 1.5 to 23.3 ppb, and < 1 to 141.9 𝜇g/m3, respectively. Personal endotoxin ranged from 0.04 to 101.3 EU/m3, 𝛽-glucan from 18.5 to 1,162 pg/m3, BC from < 0.3 to 46.9 𝜇g/m3, BrC from < 0.3 to 6.1 𝜇g/m3, and ETS from < 0.3 to 56.6 𝜇g/m3. Correlations between personal and ambient PM10, NO2, and O3 concentrations were poor, whereas personal PM10 and NO2 correlated with in-home concentrations. In-home monitoring less frequently detected BrC (Personal:79% > lower limit of detection, Home:36.8%) and ETS (Personal:83.7%, Home:4.1%) than personal exposures, and detected BC in participants without personal exposure (Personal: 26.5%, Home: 96%). Personal exposures were not significantly associated with lung function or daily asthma control. Children requiring corticosteroid treatment for asthma exacerbation within 60 days of exposure monitoring had 1.98, 2.21 and 2.04 times higher personal exposures to BrC (p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.43-2.37), ETS (p = 0.007; 95% CI: 1.25-3.91), and endotoxin (p = 0.012; 95% CI: 1.14-3.68), respectively.

Conclusions: Although in-home monitoring was correlated with personal exposure to PM10 and NO2, in-home detection of ETS and BrC was not associated with personal exposures. Personal PM10 exposures in general, as well as BrC, ETS, and endotoxin levels were associated with recent childhood asthma exacerbations.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信