Quantifying suicide risk in bereaved individuals.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jeffrey M Pavlacic, Jamison S Bottomley, Joah L Williams, Alyssa A Rheingold
{"title":"Quantifying suicide risk in bereaved individuals.","authors":"Jeffrey M Pavlacic, Jamison S Bottomley, Joah L Williams, Alyssa A Rheingold","doi":"10.1037/tra0001870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Types of interpersonal loss through death, such as suicide bereavement, are associated with increased suicide risk. Quantification of suicide risk is less understood across the spectrum of traumatic (e.g., violent) and natural loss, representing a significant literature gap that could be addressed to inform the assessment of and intervention on suicide risk in bereaved adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A web panel of 2,034 adult participants was administered via Qualtrics to gather data on suicide risk across loss types in bereaved individuals. Loss groups included (a) anticipated medical causes, (b) sudden medical causes, (c) car crash, (d) suicide, (e) homicide, and (f) fatal overdose. We also included individuals reporting no significant loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with an anticipated medical loss reported the lowest suicide risk, with the highest risk reported by individuals experiencing suicide or homicide loss. Adjusting for perceived social support, individuals reporting an anticipated medical loss had lower suicide risk relative to suicide and homicide loss, while individuals with a sudden medical loss reported lower suicide risk than suicide loss. Individuals endorsing suicide loss described higher suicide risk than the no-loss group, and individuals in the homicide loss group reported higher suicide risk relative to the no-loss condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suicide risk was most elevated in traumatic loss conditions, particularly homicide and suicide loss groups. Results inform assessment and intervention surrounding bereaved individuals and suggest that individuals experiencing specific types of traumatic loss (i.e., suicide and homicide loss) are at the highest suicide risk and therefore may warrant additional screening and clinical attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001870","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Types of interpersonal loss through death, such as suicide bereavement, are associated with increased suicide risk. Quantification of suicide risk is less understood across the spectrum of traumatic (e.g., violent) and natural loss, representing a significant literature gap that could be addressed to inform the assessment of and intervention on suicide risk in bereaved adults.

Method: A web panel of 2,034 adult participants was administered via Qualtrics to gather data on suicide risk across loss types in bereaved individuals. Loss groups included (a) anticipated medical causes, (b) sudden medical causes, (c) car crash, (d) suicide, (e) homicide, and (f) fatal overdose. We also included individuals reporting no significant loss.

Results: Individuals with an anticipated medical loss reported the lowest suicide risk, with the highest risk reported by individuals experiencing suicide or homicide loss. Adjusting for perceived social support, individuals reporting an anticipated medical loss had lower suicide risk relative to suicide and homicide loss, while individuals with a sudden medical loss reported lower suicide risk than suicide loss. Individuals endorsing suicide loss described higher suicide risk than the no-loss group, and individuals in the homicide loss group reported higher suicide risk relative to the no-loss condition.

Conclusion: Suicide risk was most elevated in traumatic loss conditions, particularly homicide and suicide loss groups. Results inform assessment and intervention surrounding bereaved individuals and suggest that individuals experiencing specific types of traumatic loss (i.e., suicide and homicide loss) are at the highest suicide risk and therefore may warrant additional screening and clinical attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信