Identifying enablers and barriers to teleultrasound use for remote settings: A scoping review

Q3 Medicine
Aubree Anderson, Rebecca G Theophanous
{"title":"Identifying enablers and barriers to teleultrasound use for remote settings: A scoping review","authors":"Aubree Anderson,&nbsp;Rebecca G Theophanous","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Teleultrasound connects expert point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) users with remote community and rural sites. Evolving technologies including handheld devices, upgraded image quality, and the ability to transmit over low bandwidth connections increase POCUS education, accessibility, and clinical integration. Potential teleultrasound venues include low-resource settings, prehospital care, and austere environments (high altitudes, microgravity, conflict zones, etc.). This scoping review assesses current teleultrasound uses and identifies implementation enablers and barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the PRISMA-ScR checklist, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched on 16 August 2024 for teleultrasound studies. Two reviewers independently screened results and abstracted data using a data collection table. 165 articles met the following inclusion criteria: research studies describing teleultrasound, involving humans, including healthcare workers, with remote point-of-care or medical ultrasound use, in any setting, and in English.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Teleultrasound studies were reported in most specialties and across all continents. Most were prospective (100 studies), review articles (27), or case studies (14). Study quality was variable, with 28 high quality, 77 moderate, 54 low, and 6 very low (GRADE assessment tool). Common themes that emerged include (1) type of image transmission method utilised, (2) remote provider training and curriculum development, (3) feedback methods between expert and novice users, (4) technologies and devices used, and (5) enablers and barriers to guide future teleultrasound implementation and training strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the teleultrasound literature is heterogeneous in setting, design, and quality outcomes. As teleultrasound technology evolves and the use expands, future studies should standardise protocols and ensure image quality fidelity to optimise remote patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose

Teleultrasound connects expert point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) users with remote community and rural sites. Evolving technologies including handheld devices, upgraded image quality, and the ability to transmit over low bandwidth connections increase POCUS education, accessibility, and clinical integration. Potential teleultrasound venues include low-resource settings, prehospital care, and austere environments (high altitudes, microgravity, conflict zones, etc.). This scoping review assesses current teleultrasound uses and identifies implementation enablers and barriers.

Methods

Using the PRISMA-ScR checklist, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched on 16 August 2024 for teleultrasound studies. Two reviewers independently screened results and abstracted data using a data collection table. 165 articles met the following inclusion criteria: research studies describing teleultrasound, involving humans, including healthcare workers, with remote point-of-care or medical ultrasound use, in any setting, and in English.

Results

Teleultrasound studies were reported in most specialties and across all continents. Most were prospective (100 studies), review articles (27), or case studies (14). Study quality was variable, with 28 high quality, 77 moderate, 54 low, and 6 very low (GRADE assessment tool). Common themes that emerged include (1) type of image transmission method utilised, (2) remote provider training and curriculum development, (3) feedback methods between expert and novice users, (4) technologies and devices used, and (5) enablers and barriers to guide future teleultrasound implementation and training strategies.

Conclusion

Overall, the teleultrasound literature is heterogeneous in setting, design, and quality outcomes. As teleultrasound technology evolves and the use expands, future studies should standardise protocols and ensure image quality fidelity to optimise remote patient care.

确定远程超声在偏远地区使用的促进因素和障碍:范围审查。
介绍/用途:Teleultrasound将专家护理点超声(POCUS)用户与偏远社区和农村站点连接起来。包括手持设备、升级的图像质量和通过低带宽连接传输的能力在内的不断发展的技术增加了POCUS教育、可访问性和临床集成。潜在的远程超声场所包括低资源环境、院前护理和恶劣环境(高海拔、微重力、冲突地区等)。本范围审查评估了目前远程超声的使用,并确定了实施的推动因素和障碍。方法:使用PRISMA-ScR检查表,检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane于2024年8月16日进行的远程超声研究。两名审稿人独立筛选结果并使用数据收集表提取数据。165篇文章符合以下纳入标准:描述远程超声的研究,涉及人类,包括卫生保健工作者,在任何环境下使用远程护理点或医疗超声,并以英语进行。结果:远程超声研究报告在大多数专业和所有大陆。大多数是前瞻性研究(100项研究)、综述性文章(27篇)或案例研究(14篇)。研究质量是可变的,28个高质量,77个中等质量,54个低质量,6个非常低质量(GRADE评估工具)。出现的共同主题包括(1)使用的图像传输方法类型,(2)远程提供者培训和课程开发,(3)专家和新手用户之间的反馈方法,(4)使用的技术和设备,以及(5)指导未来远程超声实施和培训策略的促成因素和障碍。结论:总体而言,远程超声文献在设置、设计和质量结果方面存在差异。随着远程超声技术的发展和应用的扩大,未来的研究应该标准化协议,确保图像质量的保真度,以优化远程患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信