Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis vs open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu
{"title":"Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis <i>vs</i> open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.","authors":"Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (<i>P</i> = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (<i>P</i> = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"98269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).

Aim: To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.

Results: Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (P = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (P = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (P = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.

腹腔镜体腔内吻合术与开放式吻合术在克罗恩病回肠造口翻转术中的应用:单中心回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信