Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito
{"title":"An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) prior to biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences prior to prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI-metrics as input <i>classifiers</i> and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density, and PI-RADS) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score <u>></u>7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.52-2.73, p<0.01), as were PSA density (OR 2.02, 95%CI 1.21-3.35, p=0.01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, p=0.01; OR 9.67, 95%CI 2.89-32.7, for PI-RADS 4-5, p<0.01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSA density + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs. 0.859, p=0.89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, p<0.01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared to biopsy for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our <i>DBSI</i>-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"101097JU0000000000004456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) prior to biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.
Materials and methods: Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences prior to prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI-metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density, and PI-RADS) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score >7.
Results: The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.52-2.73, p<0.01), as were PSA density (OR 2.02, 95%CI 1.21-3.35, p=0.01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, p=0.01; OR 9.67, 95%CI 2.89-32.7, for PI-RADS 4-5, p<0.01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSA density + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs. 0.859, p=0.89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, p<0.01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared to biopsy for all).
Conclusions: Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.