{"title":"Should antinuclear antibodies (ANA) be used to screen for connective tissue disease in neurological patients?","authors":"Erez Magiel, Yuval Kozlov, Tomer Goldberg, Roni Loebenstein, Abdualla Watad, Omer Gendelman, Saar Anis","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) can have a wide range of neurological manifestations. Neurological complaints may be the presenting symptom of CTD. Therefore, screening for CTD using anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) is a common practice. However, due to the abundance of positive ANA in a healthy population, interpretation of the results may be complex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we retrospectively evaluated files of patients hospitalized for evaluation of neurological symptoms in Sheba Medical Center during the years 2007-2022. Data was collected regarding epidemiology, ANA status, and rheumatological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4723 patients' files were reviewed. Of them, 46.6 % were positive for ANA. 6.9 % of them were diagnosed with CTD. This population had significantly higher rates of positive ANA status (71.2 % vs 28.8 %, p < 0.001), was significantly older (59.4 vs 53.4 years, p < 0.001) and had a significantly higher ANA titer (1:484.8, 1:268 p < 0.001) compared to patients without CTD. Factors which were found predictive for CTD diagnosis included female gender, older age, ANA titer above 1:160, and the diagnosis of a non-vascular etiology for the neurological disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females, older patients, patients with high ANA titer and with diagnosis of a non-vascular cause to their neurological complains may be more likely to harbor a CTD and should probably be further evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"469 ","pages":"123374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) can have a wide range of neurological manifestations. Neurological complaints may be the presenting symptom of CTD. Therefore, screening for CTD using anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) is a common practice. However, due to the abundance of positive ANA in a healthy population, interpretation of the results may be complex.
Methods: we retrospectively evaluated files of patients hospitalized for evaluation of neurological symptoms in Sheba Medical Center during the years 2007-2022. Data was collected regarding epidemiology, ANA status, and rheumatological diagnosis.
Results: 4723 patients' files were reviewed. Of them, 46.6 % were positive for ANA. 6.9 % of them were diagnosed with CTD. This population had significantly higher rates of positive ANA status (71.2 % vs 28.8 %, p < 0.001), was significantly older (59.4 vs 53.4 years, p < 0.001) and had a significantly higher ANA titer (1:484.8, 1:268 p < 0.001) compared to patients without CTD. Factors which were found predictive for CTD diagnosis included female gender, older age, ANA titer above 1:160, and the diagnosis of a non-vascular etiology for the neurological disease.
Conclusion: Females, older patients, patients with high ANA titer and with diagnosis of a non-vascular cause to their neurological complains may be more likely to harbor a CTD and should probably be further evaluated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials).
JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.