Refractive Accuracy of a Novel Swept-Source OCT in Patients With Short and Long Eyes.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9987580
Laureano A Rementería-Capelo, Inés Contreras, Jorge L García-Pérez, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer
{"title":"Refractive Accuracy of a Novel Swept-Source OCT in Patients With Short and Long Eyes.","authors":"Laureano A Rementería-Capelo, Inés Contreras, Jorge L García-Pérez, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer","doi":"10.1155/joph/9987580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyze the refractive accuracy of a novel swept-source optical coherence biometer (SS-OCT), that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length, in short and long eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective comparative study considered eyes with short axial length (AL) (< 22.5 mm) or long AL (> 26 mm) bilaterally implanted with the Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL. All eyes were preoperatively analyzed with the Argos biometer and IOL calculations were made using the Barrett Universal II (BUII). One month after the surgery, refractive and visual outcomes and refractive prediction errors were calculated. Furthermore, a back calculation of the prediction errors based on the Barrett True Axial Length (BTAL) formula was also performed and the results of both formulas were compared. <b>Results:</b> Sixty eyes of 60 patients (30 with AL < 22.5 mm (short) and 30 with AL > 26 mm (long)) were included. After surgery, monocular UDVA was 0.03 ± 0.10 and 0.10 ± 0.15 logMAR for short-eye and long-eye groups, respectively. For short eyes, mean prediction error (MPE) with BUII and BTAL were 0.19 ± 0.34 D and 0.00 ± 0.35 D, respectively (<i>p</i>  <  0.001). Mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.32 ± 0.22 D with the BUII and 0.29 ± 0.20 D with the BTAL formula (<i>p</i>=0.21). For long eyes, MPE with BUII was -0.15 ± 0.35 D and -0.13 ± 0.36 D with BTAL (<i>p</i>=0.08), while MAE was 0.31 ± 0.21 D and 0.32 ± 0.20 D with BUII and BTAL, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.33). The percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.5 D predicted postop spherical equivalent was > 75% for both groups and both formulas (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all situations). <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel SS-OCT biometer using individual refractive indices to measure AL showed an overall good refractive accuracy using the BUII. The results were similar or better with the optimized BTAL formula, suggesting that formulas purposely designed for biometric measurements with this novel technology are a promising tool for eyes with extreme AL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9987580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9987580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the refractive accuracy of a novel swept-source optical coherence biometer (SS-OCT), that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length, in short and long eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This retrospective comparative study considered eyes with short axial length (AL) (< 22.5 mm) or long AL (> 26 mm) bilaterally implanted with the Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL. All eyes were preoperatively analyzed with the Argos biometer and IOL calculations were made using the Barrett Universal II (BUII). One month after the surgery, refractive and visual outcomes and refractive prediction errors were calculated. Furthermore, a back calculation of the prediction errors based on the Barrett True Axial Length (BTAL) formula was also performed and the results of both formulas were compared. Results: Sixty eyes of 60 patients (30 with AL < 22.5 mm (short) and 30 with AL > 26 mm (long)) were included. After surgery, monocular UDVA was 0.03 ± 0.10 and 0.10 ± 0.15 logMAR for short-eye and long-eye groups, respectively. For short eyes, mean prediction error (MPE) with BUII and BTAL were 0.19 ± 0.34 D and 0.00 ± 0.35 D, respectively (p  <  0.001). Mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.32 ± 0.22 D with the BUII and 0.29 ± 0.20 D with the BTAL formula (p=0.21). For long eyes, MPE with BUII was -0.15 ± 0.35 D and -0.13 ± 0.36 D with BTAL (p=0.08), while MAE was 0.31 ± 0.21 D and 0.32 ± 0.20 D with BUII and BTAL, respectively (p=0.33). The percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.5 D predicted postop spherical equivalent was > 75% for both groups and both formulas (p > 0.05 for all situations). Conclusions: The novel SS-OCT biometer using individual refractive indices to measure AL showed an overall good refractive accuracy using the BUII. The results were similar or better with the optimized BTAL formula, suggesting that formulas purposely designed for biometric measurements with this novel technology are a promising tool for eyes with extreme AL.

一种新型扫描源OCT在短眼和长眼患者中的屈光精度。
目的:分析一种新型扫描源光学相干生物计(SS-OCT)在植入单焦点人工晶状体(iol)的短眼和长眼中使用单个折射率测量轴向长度的屈光精度。方法:采用双侧短眼轴长(AL < 22.5 mm)和长眼轴长(AL > 26mm)植入acryysof IQ单焦点人工晶状体进行回顾性比较研究。术前使用Argos生物计分析所有眼睛,使用Barrett Universal II (BUII)计算人工晶体。术后1个月计算屈光、视力结果及屈光预测误差。此外,还对Barrett真轴向长度(BTAL)公式的预测误差进行了反算,并对两种公式的预测结果进行了比较。结果:纳入60例患者60只眼,其中AL长26mm者30只。术后,短眼组和长眼组单眼UDVA分别为0.03±0.10和0.10±0.15 logMAR。对于短眼,BUII和BTAL的平均预测误差(MPE)分别为0.19±0.34 D和0.00±0.35 D (p < 0.001)。BUII公式的平均绝对误差为0.32±0.22 D, BTAL公式的平均绝对误差为0.29±0.20 D (p=0.21)。对于长眼,BUII组MPE为-0.15±0.35 D, BTAL组MPE为-0.13±0.36 D (p=0.08), BUII组MAE为0.31±0.21 D, BTAL组MAE为0.32±0.20 D (p=0.33)。在两组和两种公式中,预测误差在±0.5 D内的眼睛百分比为> 75%(所有情况下p > 0.05)。结论:使用单个折射率测量AL的新型SS-OCT生物计在使用BUII时显示出良好的折射精度。结果与优化后的BTAL配方相似或更好,这表明专门为这种新技术设计的生物识别测量配方是一种很有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信