Role of single peroneal versus single non-peroneal tibial angioplasty in limb salvage.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Amr A Mahmoud, Emad E Hussein, Assem M Herzallah, Mohamed A Elbahat
{"title":"Role of single peroneal versus single non-peroneal tibial angioplasty in limb salvage.","authors":"Amr A Mahmoud, Emad E Hussein, Assem M Herzallah, Mohamed A Elbahat","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05305-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The peroneal artery is known to give branches to the anterior and posterior tibial arteries. Scattered reports in the literature over the last decade failed to provide solid evidence as to the optimum strategy for below-knee targeted revascularization in limited-option patients with critical limb-treating ischemia (CLTI). We sought to determine the benefit of performing single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization compared with single non-peroneal angiosome-targeted tibial artery angioplasty revascularization for patients presented with CLTI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-center, retrospective cohort study of patients presented with CLTI treated with below-the-knee endovascular intervention from January 2020 to January 2022. Group 1 included patients who were treated with single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Group 2 included patients who were treated with single non-peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Patients had no proximal lesions or previous intervention to tibial arteries. The primary endpoint is limb salvage. The secondary endpoints include wound healing and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 45 patients presented with critical limb ischemia, they were treated with single angiosome-targeted tibial angioplasty revascularization, they were divided into 13 patients (28.9%) with single peroneal revascularization (group 1) and 32 patients (71.1%) with single non-peroneal revascularization (group 2), 20 patients (44.4%) had target anterior tibial artery, while 12 patients (26.7%) had target posterior tibial artery. The follow-up duration was 6 months. No difference was found in limb salvage between the two groups (92.3% vs. 87.1%; P=1). No differences were found in wound healing rates between the two groups (76.9% vs. 81.3%; P=0.281). The overall 30-day survival rate was 100% in both study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single peroneal tibial revascularization mostly is non-inferior to single non-peroneal angiosome targeted tibial artery revascularization regarding limb salvage and wound healing for patients with critical limb ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"43 6","pages":"606-614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05305-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The peroneal artery is known to give branches to the anterior and posterior tibial arteries. Scattered reports in the literature over the last decade failed to provide solid evidence as to the optimum strategy for below-knee targeted revascularization in limited-option patients with critical limb-treating ischemia (CLTI). We sought to determine the benefit of performing single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization compared with single non-peroneal angiosome-targeted tibial artery angioplasty revascularization for patients presented with CLTI.

Methods: We performed a two-center, retrospective cohort study of patients presented with CLTI treated with below-the-knee endovascular intervention from January 2020 to January 2022. Group 1 included patients who were treated with single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Group 2 included patients who were treated with single non-peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Patients had no proximal lesions or previous intervention to tibial arteries. The primary endpoint is limb salvage. The secondary endpoints include wound healing and all-cause mortality.

Results: This study included 45 patients presented with critical limb ischemia, they were treated with single angiosome-targeted tibial angioplasty revascularization, they were divided into 13 patients (28.9%) with single peroneal revascularization (group 1) and 32 patients (71.1%) with single non-peroneal revascularization (group 2), 20 patients (44.4%) had target anterior tibial artery, while 12 patients (26.7%) had target posterior tibial artery. The follow-up duration was 6 months. No difference was found in limb salvage between the two groups (92.3% vs. 87.1%; P=1). No differences were found in wound healing rates between the two groups (76.9% vs. 81.3%; P=0.281). The overall 30-day survival rate was 100% in both study groups.

Conclusions: Single peroneal tibial revascularization mostly is non-inferior to single non-peroneal angiosome targeted tibial artery revascularization regarding limb salvage and wound healing for patients with critical limb ischemia.

单腓骨与单非腓骨胫骨血管成形术在保肢中的作用。
背景:腓骨动脉为胫前动脉和胫后动脉提供分支。在过去的十年中,文献中的零星报道未能提供关于有限选择的危重肢体治疗性缺血(CLTI)患者的膝下靶向血运重建术的最佳策略的确凿证据。我们试图确定进行单一腓骨胫骨动脉血管成形术重建术与单一非腓骨血管体靶向胫骨动脉血管成形术重建术对CLTI患者的益处。方法:我们对2020年1月至2022年1月期间接受膝关节以下血管内介入治疗的CLTI患者进行了一项双中心、回顾性队列研究。组1包括采用单腓胫动脉血管成形术重建术的患者。组2为单股非腓胫动脉血管成形术重建术。患者没有近端病变或先前的干预胫骨动脉。主要终点是肢体保留。次要终点包括伤口愈合和全因死亡率。结果:本研究纳入45例危重肢体缺血患者,均行单血管体靶向胫骨血管成形术重建术,分为单腓血管重建术(1组)13例(28.9%)和单非腓血管重建术(2组)32例(71.1%),其中胫骨前动脉重建术20例(44.4%),胫骨后动脉重建术12例(26.7%)。随访时间为6个月。两组残肢保留率无差异(92.3% vs. 87.1%;P = 1)。两组伤口愈合率无差异(76.9% vs. 81.3%;P = 0.281)。两个研究组的总30天生存率均为100%。结论:对于危重肢体缺血患者,单腓骨胫骨血管重建术在保肢和创面愈合方面优于单腓骨血管小体胫动脉重建术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信