Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Henry Platt, Abby Fraade, Brian Shiner
{"title":"Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder","authors":"Maxwell Levis,&nbsp;Monica Dimambro,&nbsp;Joshua Levy,&nbsp;Henry Platt,&nbsp;Abby Fraade,&nbsp;Brian Shiner","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent psychiatric condition, particularly among US Veterans. PTSD-diagnosed patients are more likely to experience suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and death by suicide when compared to non-PTSD-diagnosed patients. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) emphasizes evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for PTSD, including prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy. This study focuses on how suicide risk impacts PTSD by evaluating utilization of nondifferentiated psychotherapy and EBP in a national sample of VA patients diagnosed with PTSD who died by suicide in 2017–2018.</p>\n <p>The study used a dataset of VA patients diagnosed with PTSD who died by suicide and received psychotherapy in the year before death (cases) and patients who had comparable diagnoses, demographics and received psychotherapy during the same interval and remained alive (controls). Cases and controls were matched on suicide risk (high, moderate and low). The study tracked nondifferentiated psychotherapy and EBP and analyzed cases and control utilization rates across risk-tiers.</p>\n <p>The final sample included high-risk (cases = 171; controls = 2052), moderate-risk (cases = 428; controls = 4280) and low-risk (cases = 53; controls = 529) patients. EBP utilization was markedly low, especially among cases. Higher proportions of moderate- and low-risk controls received EBP and received more sessions than matched cases.</p>\n <p>Even with VA efforts to promote EBPs, usage remains limited, particularly among patients who die by suicide. Further research is needed to understand utilization barriers and improve EBP delivery to better support PTSD-diagnosed patients and reduce their suicide risk.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent psychiatric condition, particularly among US Veterans. PTSD-diagnosed patients are more likely to experience suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and death by suicide when compared to non-PTSD-diagnosed patients. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) emphasizes evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for PTSD, including prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy. This study focuses on how suicide risk impacts PTSD by evaluating utilization of nondifferentiated psychotherapy and EBP in a national sample of VA patients diagnosed with PTSD who died by suicide in 2017–2018.

The study used a dataset of VA patients diagnosed with PTSD who died by suicide and received psychotherapy in the year before death (cases) and patients who had comparable diagnoses, demographics and received psychotherapy during the same interval and remained alive (controls). Cases and controls were matched on suicide risk (high, moderate and low). The study tracked nondifferentiated psychotherapy and EBP and analyzed cases and control utilization rates across risk-tiers.

The final sample included high-risk (cases = 171; controls = 2052), moderate-risk (cases = 428; controls = 4280) and low-risk (cases = 53; controls = 529) patients. EBP utilization was markedly low, especially among cases. Higher proportions of moderate- and low-risk controls received EBP and received more sessions than matched cases.

Even with VA efforts to promote EBPs, usage remains limited, particularly among patients who die by suicide. Further research is needed to understand utilization barriers and improve EBP delivery to better support PTSD-diagnosed patients and reduce their suicide risk.

评估创伤后应激障碍自杀风险分层退伍军人的循证心理治疗使用模式。
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种普遍的精神疾病,尤其是在美国退伍军人中。与非ptsd患者相比,ptsd患者更容易产生自杀意念、自杀企图和自杀死亡。美国退伍军人事务部(VA)强调PTSD的循证心理治疗(EBP),包括长时间暴露和认知加工治疗。本研究通过评估2017-2018年自杀死亡的退伍军人事务部诊断为PTSD的全国样本中无分化心理治疗和EBP的使用情况,重点研究自杀风险如何影响PTSD。该研究使用了退伍军人事务部诊断为创伤后应激障碍的患者的数据集,这些患者在死亡前一年死于自杀并接受了心理治疗(病例),以及诊断、人口统计学和在相同间隔内接受心理治疗并存活的患者(对照组)。病例和对照组的自杀风险(高、中、低)相匹配。该研究追踪了无区别心理治疗和EBP,并分析了不同风险等级的病例和控制使用率。最终样本包括高危人群(病例= 171;对照组= 2052),中度风险(病例= 428;对照组= 4280)和低危组(病例= 53;对照组= 529例。EBP的使用率明显较低,特别是在病例中。中等和低风险对照组接受EBP治疗的比例较高,治疗时间也比对照组多。即使退伍军人事务部努力推广ebp,其使用仍然有限,特别是在自杀死亡的患者中。需要进一步的研究来了解使用障碍和改善EBP的交付,以更好地支持ptsd诊断患者并降低其自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信