{"title":"Report on Evolving Indications, Technique, and Outcomes of Novel And Surgical Procedures-NUsurface.","authors":"Thomas R Carter","doi":"10.1007/s12178-025-09944-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Meniscectomy alters knee function and known to be associated with an increased incidence of knee arthritis. Several methods and materials have been tried to replicate the function of a meniscus. One is a polycarbonate-urethane synthetic medial meniscus implant labeled as NUsurface. It is a non-anchored implant that is meant to replace the native meniscus. This article is intended to give an overview of the NUsurface implant and the experience to date.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The NUsurface implant is not intended to be a substitute for arthroplasty but has indications similar to meniscal allografts. It has had both prospective double armed and single armed prospective studies. Follow up at the 2-year mark has shown the implant can be successful in decreasing patients' pain and improving function. However, the reoperation rate has been high with a little over a 1/3 requiring an additional procedure and 30% requiring implant exchanged. With improved surgical technique and knowledge of contributing anatomic variables, the reoperation rate has been decreased by half. The synthetic medial meniscus implant NUsurface is able to improve the quality of life in select patients that are symptomatic after meniscectomy. The reoperation rate is of concern but it is decreasing as we refine the variables contributing to the high rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10950,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-025-09944-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Meniscectomy alters knee function and known to be associated with an increased incidence of knee arthritis. Several methods and materials have been tried to replicate the function of a meniscus. One is a polycarbonate-urethane synthetic medial meniscus implant labeled as NUsurface. It is a non-anchored implant that is meant to replace the native meniscus. This article is intended to give an overview of the NUsurface implant and the experience to date.
Recent findings: The NUsurface implant is not intended to be a substitute for arthroplasty but has indications similar to meniscal allografts. It has had both prospective double armed and single armed prospective studies. Follow up at the 2-year mark has shown the implant can be successful in decreasing patients' pain and improving function. However, the reoperation rate has been high with a little over a 1/3 requiring an additional procedure and 30% requiring implant exchanged. With improved surgical technique and knowledge of contributing anatomic variables, the reoperation rate has been decreased by half. The synthetic medial meniscus implant NUsurface is able to improve the quality of life in select patients that are symptomatic after meniscectomy. The reoperation rate is of concern but it is decreasing as we refine the variables contributing to the high rate.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert world-renowned authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of musculoskeletal-related conditions.
We accomplish this aim by appointing authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as rehabilitation of the knee and hip, sports medicine, trauma, pediatrics, health policy, customization in arthroplasty, and rheumatology. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.